Connect with us

Opinion

Modern-day Journalism As A Barrier To National Development

Published

on

Modern-day Journalism As A Barrier To National Development

By

Grace Ego Omoni

The general conception of people before now was that journalists had the responsibility of reporting news and stories in a way that such will bring forth peace, progress and development to the nation. Unfortunately, this is not so to the utter dismay of well-meaning readers. The level of menace and negative styles of news reports trending in the country today are quite distressing and shameful! The habit of feeding the reading populace with junks and conflicting, false, opposing and unverified news is the order of the day in today’s Nigerian journalism not found anywhere else in the world. Even though it has been observed that the style is spreading globally, that of Nigeria is totally an aberration. It is indeed a display and show of immaturity, sycophancy and illiteracy by the perpetrators. This is done to please their paymasters( he who pays the piper dictates the tune) while ruining the dignity and integrity of this nation.

The original role of journalism is to keep readers informed with the happenings of the time and not to disintegrate the society and the democratic system. However, this new trend of journalism has led to distrust in our democratic institutions. Hardly can any well-disciplined Nigerian depend on the media industry for a faultless, authentic piece of news as the country had in the early sixties. I purse to ask, who had bewitched the information industry or the journalists who were supposed to be intellectuals, and people of impeccable characters with non- partisan dispositions? Am I being made to now accept that the spirit of greed, rascality, dishonor and lack integrity has gradually crept into this noble profession? Or is it that the present-day journalists lack effective training in the school of journalism?

This article intends to expose the readers to some ways through which journalists have bastardized their profession to the detriment of national development and unity and further plunging citizens into total ignorance of the true nature of the stories presented.

READ ALSO: Narrow Politics And Questions Of Democratic Development

Journalism is the production of and dissemination of current events based on facts and supported with proofs or evidence. It applies to the occupation of the media industry which gathers and publishes information based on facts. Journalistic nedia include print, social media outlets, television, radio, internet and in the past, newsreel. It might be controlled by the government and may not be fully independent or might be independently operated by a private organization. It has differing laws handling the freedom of speech and libel cases. There are journalism ethics and standards and these comprise principles of ethics of good practice applicable to journalists. How well are these principles kept?

Journalism’s professional codes of conduct are based on the principles of truthfulness, objectivity, impartiality, accuracy, fairness and accountability to public opinions. My personal observation of the practice of journalism in this country convinces me that some journalists are far from maintaining these principles. Rather, they engage in faulty dissemination of information in the media within the various types of journalism such as business, political, advocacy, investigative, interactive, photo, gonzo global and tabloid journalism. Take for instance in photo journalism, a story is told about a said adulterer with a photograph of a very beautiful decent lady only to have a comment at the end that the image was not the real person but only used as an illustration! What do you call that? This is totally unacceptable because it is a deliberate attempt to deceive the readers. This leads us to the concepts of disinformation and misinformation.

This is the act of deliberately and intentionally disseminating information that is untrue with the aim of misleading readers to ultimately benefit the cause, the organisation, party or an individual. Disinformation is also seen as all forms of false, inaccurate or misleading information designed, presented and promoted to intentionally cause public harm. According to Gelfert, disinformation or fake news is the deliberate presentation of typically false or misleading claims as news whereas the claims are misleading by design. Again, Rini asserts that a fake story is one that purports to describe events in the world typically by mimicking the conventional reportage yet it is known by the creators to be significantly false transmitted with the goal of it being widely retransmitted and deceiving at least some of its audience. In other words, conspiracy theories, lies and hoaxes have been circulated under the guise of news report to benefit specific people who pay journalists for such actions.

READ ALSO: Defence Agency Quizzes Ex-navy Commodore Over TV Interview On Terrorists

Disinformation is another term for fake news. It can be spread using many of the same tactics: fabricated reports and click baits. It is created by journalists to deceive people in order to increase their social media marketing effectiveness, boost their online traffic, build more gullible followers, incite emotional response from the readers or create distractions. Politicians, business organizations and the government of the day are guilty of this phenomenon. It can be very dangerous because it is capable of distorting public opinion and the peace of the society. Most of the social, political, ethnic and religious challenges in Nigeria today are as a result of disinformation or fake news. The threats to this nation’s development and unity are as the result of mindless fake news by paid journalists and press agents of organizations, federal, state, local governments and supposedly men and women who ought to be seen as responsible citizens but have now lost their integrity in the society to perpetrate this shameless vice in the 21st century. Disinformation is a term used to encompass a wide range of different types of information and rumours about politics and other public events that are deliberately factually incorrect.

The consequences of societal exposure to disinformation providers are many. Politicians can intentionally sow seed of distrust in established media organizations to help boost less credibility to their opposing party. It leads to unstable democracy, readers are misled thereby making them to take wrong decisions. The quality of democracy is partly a function of the extent to which the people accept the political candidates who are engaged in politics of lies and deceits. The spread of political disinformation in online settings will indeed have negative consequences, hence, Nigeria politics today has no integrity neither is it progressive. My cry is that many paid trolls post inflammatory messages to sow discord and cause reactions. They are fond of planting stories that are not true but which elicit emotional response and highlight hypocrisy. As said earlier, disinformation actions and practices are dangerous because of their divisive impact and harm to the nation. Individuals are not only targets but also mediums for disinformation distribution.

READ ALSO: On My Funeral

Government-owned and sponsored media outlets are known to be important vehicles of disinformation campaigns. For instance, we have cases where different independent media forums might give factual information about the activities of bandits, Fulani herdsmen attacks and ruthless activities and then suddenly, government media outlets will play down or counter these pieces of information using disinformation tactics. I mean disseminating information that is intentionally and verifiably false to mislead the readers. This has plunged this country to breed citizens that have no confidence at all in the administration of the day. Most often, when an individual be he an academic intellectual or a Christian or Muslim cleric boldly questions or comments on the events going on in the country, journalists and crooked individuals who are paid by unknown and known disgruntled elements deliberately use the disinformation strategy to destroy the reputation of such critics. Do we call this journalism? Journalists have the responsibility to report in a way that will return sanity to the system to bring about unity and development instead of escalating crisis.

Another form of aberration in disseminating information in our social media is by misinformation. This is also false news, woefully and grossly inadequate and misleading but shared with no harm in mind due to mistake made by one who did not follow the trend of events properly. It is not deliberately intended to deceive. It might have been intended to shape or change opinion of a given topic. It appears to have limited effects to citizens’ level of political knowledge. To illustrate what misinformation means, during my school days, our lecturer selected about six students and gave a message to the first person and was now asked to pass on the message to the next person who in turn passed it on to the next until the message got to the last. It was quite surprising to find out that the last person’s message was totally different from the message of the lecturer to the first student. The meaning and every bit of the message have been distorted! Would you say it was intentional? Mistakes have been made in the process of transmission. This is a case of misinformation. This type of information dissemination goes on unabated in the news industry. In conventional traditional method of news reportage there used to be a term “corrigendum” which the journslist used to correct any information which was not correctly reported. Today it is not so.

READ ALSO: Omoyele Sowore: A President, A Prisoner, And A Promise

Journalists ignore misinformation as if it is a necessary tool in disseminating information.
Whereas material or information that is shared with malicious intent is recognized as disinformation, the information shared by a poorly informed party or individual is viewed as misinformation.

Closely related to the above tactics is mal-information. This is genuine information that is shared to cause harm. It is not fake news and we see this in our social media every now and then.

Although the freedom of disseminating information is active in the country, it however, does not warrant breaching its application. People’s characters have been assassinated, well-meaning projects have been ruined , properties destroyed and human lives wasted as a result of disinformation, mal-information, misinformation and fake news The habit of feeding the public with false, fake, conflicting or opposing information deliberately, intentionally or unintentionally is quite uncalled for and need not be practised in a civil society because of its misleading consequences capable of fanning embers of disunity and animosity in the society. It breeds gullibility, promotes dishonesty, ignorance, chaos, enmity among people and disunity and underdevelopment to the nation. It is dangerous, retrogressive, deceitful, misleading and suppresses people from making objective criticisms that will bring about national development.

To improve modern journalism, the following steps are important:
1) Journalists should maintain the principles of the codes of conduct and canons of journalism.

2) Culprits who arbitrarily disseminate fake news, disinformation and misinformation should be sanctioned and their licences withdrawn;

3) Sensitization programmes should be organized for the people on how to decipher fake information;

4) Ethics and good practice applicable to journalists should emphasized;

5) Literacy journalism should be included in the school curriculum;

6) Political trolls used and paid by government and individuals to give intentional fake news and reports should be litigated;

7) Media outlets whether controlled by the government or privately owned should be given proper orientation on integrity, morality and dignity in carrying out their roles to improve the society and not for greed.

8) Journalists should not hesitate to make amendments and genuinely apologize when there is faulty dissemination of information on the media;

9) The government should be the vanguard of disseminating authentic information. Indicting and banning media outlets when they are equally guilty of the offence is outright hypocricy.

READ ALSO: Coronation Of Olu Of Warri And Nigeria’s Resistance

Journalists are critics. Most often they are quick to see the fault of the other person but fail to see or are blind to their own weaknesses. Nobody is perfect but deliberately feigning ignorance of the gross damage being perpetrated by these professionals and their accomplices has plunged the nation into darkness, disorderliness disunity and underdevelopment. Journalists are supposed to be reformers, builders and people of impeccable character. Who has bewitched the practice of journalism in this country, I ask again?

 

Read more authentic news on our social media platforms

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Opinion

Stellenbosch: Senzeni Na And Decolonizing Secularity In Africa

Published

on

Witch Burning, Impunity And Abuses Linked to Witchcraft Beliefs In Benue State
Dr Leo Igwe

By Leo Igwe

In December, I attended a workshop on Decolonizing Secularity in Africa. It was one of my best conferences because it highlighted issues that have worried me over the years. For the first time, I attended an academic conference on religion or secularism in Africa that featured a panel on atheism and humanism in Africa. Organized by Point Sud, this workshop was held at Stellenbosch in South Africa. Interestingly I did not know about Stellenbosch’s colonial history and significance. So I could say with the benefit of hindsight that the choice of Stellenbosch as a venue for this event was adequate. The goal of the workshop was, based on the coloniality of secularity, to interrogate the “liberating force of religion, the secular in ethnic nationalisms, and the ideologies of culturalization, not least in its current revenant, heritagization, in Africa and beyond”. It was great to meet, discuss, and exchange ideas on colonization, decolonization, religion, and secularity with scholars and activists from different parts of the continent and the world. Many issues that emerged at the conference have continued to agitate my mind. First is the so much emphasis on colonization. I have continued to wonder: Can’t we meaningfully discuss African issues without alluding to colonialism? Again, reference is always made to Western colonialism. What about Eastern and other forms? Many parts of America were colonized at one point or the other. Weren’t they? The same with Europe, Asia, and Oceania. But it is only in the case of Africa that there is an overemphasis on Western colonialism. Incidentally, many African scholars have unwittingly joined in explaining Africa through the lens of colonialism, western colonialism.

The fixation on colonialism is not without a reason. I attended an African studies conference some years ago and someone alluded to a comment by a Western scholar, that regarding Africa, before colonialism, there was nothing. There was nothing? I was shocked to hear that comment. Look, that I do not know or nobody knows about a period in history, does not mean that there was nothing. Is it not better to say I do not know than to make such a dimwitted statement? What applies to Africa, applies to other places in the world. There are stages in their histories nobody knows what happened. Or what is known is patchy. That should not be a reason to say that there was nothing.

One issue that engaged attendees was the meaning of ‘decolonizing’. What does it mean to decolonize? Some define decolonization as removing or undoing colonial elements and influences. And if that is the case, what do we remove or undo? And who does that and Why? how do we undo the Western colonial linguistic influence? What about the eastern and other colonial elements? Is it possible or feasible to remove or undo all colonial influences? By the way, is religion or secularity as introduced to Africa decolonized?

Some participants argued that decolonizing secularity implied going back in time before colonialism. So, how far can we go and why? In the process won’t we go back to that time “when there was nothing?” Can’t we decolonize without returning to the past? Can’t we decolonize looking forward and not backward? Is religion or secularity not an embodiment of layers of influences over the years? If we were to peel off these ‘colonial’ elements, what would be left? Some propose a return to the indigenous forms of secularity or religion as the case may be. The question is this: What does indigenous mean? Who defines or determines it? Is the indigenous the same for all? What is considered indigenous to South Africans may not be to Kenyans, Nigerians, or Malians. What is considered indigenous in a part of Nigeria may be a legacy of the colonial influence by another part of Nigeria. So what is indigenous to Africa is not monolithic and regionally applicable.

That leads me to another controversial issue that came up at the workshop, which is, one secularity or multiple secularities. Some of the participants especially those from the Department of Religion, at the University of Cape Town were of the view that there was one secularity, that is the western secularity is manifesting in other climes, in different forms. While other participants from Europe leaned towards the notion of multiple secularities highlighting forms of distinction and differentiation between religion and other social domains across cultures. Although secularism or secularity is Western in origin, what the concept represents manifests in other cultures and societies. Secularities predate Western secularity or manifest and feature in ways that do not fit into or align with Western secularity.

As I noted earlier, there have been colonialisms before Western colonialism. There have been secularities before Western secularity. Although Western colonialism brought the influence of western religion and secularity to bear on various cultures and societies, the colonial encounter does not negate the social differentiation of religion and other domains in these societies. It is only in seeing or articulating secularity in its multiple forms that these situations, dynamics, and intersections could adequately be captured. So, the concept of multiple secularities has enormous explanatory power. It is useful and helpful in highlighting the social distinction of religion and other domains in cultures and societies beyond the West.

For instance, western missionaries introduced christianity and the Christian god to Africa. What we have is one Christianity or Islam manifesting in different forms. Africans have adapted and reinvented the Christian religion over the years, hence the notion of African Christianities. Again while western Christian missionaries introduced Christian religion or religiosity, they did not introduce religion. religiosity, or the idea of god. There are other religiosities apart from and beyond Christianities/Christian religiosities. There are other gods and deities beyond the Christian god/deity. I think the idea of multiple secularities or multiple religiosities has much more descriptive value.

Another issue that came up at the event, not surprisingly so, was apartheid. One of the presenters analyzed the song, Senzeni Na (What have we done?) to buttress his point. I have never heard of the song. I didn’t know its relevance to the anti-apartheid struggle. In the course of the discussions, it was noted how other Africans including Nigerians are not conscious or sensitive to the pains of apartheid. I noticed from the expressions of some South Africans at the meeting that they were not happy with the nonchalant attitudes of Nigerians towards their experience. I believe that black South Africans are right to feel that way. The apartheid was a tragic experience that still hurts blacks in contemporary South Africa. The painful memories won’t quickly go away. Black South Africans should also understand that Nigerians have a different history and experience. They should also not forget that the Nigerian and other African governments contributed a lot to the anti-apartheid struggle. Nigeria supported Nelson Mandela and other heroes and heroines of the struggle.

Many South Africans do not relate to the tragedy of the Rwandan genocide as Rwandans do. They do not relate to the pain and trauma of the Nigerian civil war. In meetings and conferences, they treat these experiences and encounters lightly because these experiences were not a part of their history. As I noted during my conversations with some of the attendees, while I appreciate the pain and trauma of apartheid, Black South Africans must learn to move on because as they say in the Igbo language, Nke chi ka, meaning, the one yet to come, the future one, the one that belongs to tomorrow, is greater. The greatness of South Africa does not lie in the past but in its tomorrow, in its future. It does not mean that we should not refer or draw from the past. We should and we must. But South Africa is not returning to those days when Senzeni Na was sung. The country is forging ahead and moving towards a better and more glorious future.

This song provides a thrust for this forward and onward movement. It highlights the challenges that South Africans face and are facing. But more importantly, this song codifies the pain and suffering of all humans because all oppressed people everywhere; all who suffer persecution within and without South Africa are singing, Senzeni Na.

Igwe, PhD,  was a co-convener of Decolonizing Secularity in Africa, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 9–13 December 2024.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Commonwealth Day 2025: Together We Can End Witch Hunts And Ritual Attacks

Published

on

Witch Burning, Impunity And Abuses Linked to Witchcraft Beliefs In Benue State
Dr Leo Igwe

By Leo Igwe

As we mark Commonwealth Day 2025, the Advocacy for Alleged Witches protests witch hunts and ritual attacks in Commonwealth countries, and the refusal of the Commonwealth to speak out against these abuses. In many parts of Africa, Asia and Oceania witch hunting is not a thing of the past but an ongoing wave of abuses and violations. In Commonwealth countries such as Ghana, Nigeria, Kenya, Papua New Guinea, persecution of alleged witches rages with force and ferocity. In Ghana, witch persecution results in the displacement of accused persons who then flee to some make shift shelters known as “witch camps”. Those who could not flee to these places like Akua Denteh are murdered in cold blood.

Witchcraft accusation is a form of death sentence for the accused and accused people are sometimes extrajudicially killed despite existing legislations in these countries. Witch trials take place in many countries of the Commonwealth. Trial by ordeal and jungle justice are meted out to the accused. Some weeks ago, an elderly woman who had dementia was accused of witchcraft and beaten to death in Nigeria. In Malawi, alleged witches are stoned to death. In Zambia some political opponents suspected of trying to kill the president using ‘witchcraft’ are standing trial at the state court. Alleged witches, mainly women, children and people with disabilities are attacked, banished, lynched, buried alive or tortured to confess to the ‘crime of witchcraft’.

Witch hunting persists because many countries and groups of countries like the Commonwealth have refused to speak out against these atrocities. The Commonwealth should break its silence on witch hunts and ritual attacks in member countries. It should join the UN in condemning these horrific abuses. The Commonwealth should add its voice to this campaign. It should highlight witch persecution and witch hunting during its meetings and summits. It should call for an end to abuses linked to witchcraft beliefs and ritual attacks. The Commonwealth Day should be an opportunity to recommit to ending this menace. It provides a platform to rally all countries against these violations. No nation should be left behind in the quest to make witch hunting history around the globe.

Together we can end witch hunts and ritual attacks in Commonwealth countries.

Igwe, PhD, directs the Advocacy for Alleged Witches.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Lead City @20: The Past And The Present

Published

on

Dele Jegede In Conversation With Prince Yemisi Shyllon
Prof. Toyin Falola

By Toyin Falola

Our university is now an adult at 20!

About twenty-two years ago, the vision to redefine the frontiers of private education in Nigeria led to the conceptualization of the idea, which birthed a new direction for education. The thoughts and projections of like-minded educators and academic experts led to the establishment of Lead City University (LCU) as a beacon for progressive education in Nigeria. This development came when access to higher education was limited by rigid institutional structures and to federal, state, and a handful of private institutions.

At inception, LCU was envisioned as an academic environment that was expected to balance flexibility with skills and academic excellence. On this note, the university became fully operational in 2005, having scaled through necessary procedures for establishment. Since then, the university has positioned itself as an institution willing to break conventional norms by offering programs that blend theoretical learning with practical application. The goal was clear—to bridge the gap between academia and the real-world demands of the job market, ensuring that students graduated with certificates, competence, and confidence. Hence the word “enterprise graduate”.

Two decades later, Lead City University has become a household name in private tertiary education in Nigeria and earned the trust of parents, guardians, students, and the education community. From its humble beginnings with two campuses around Jericho and Challenge areas of Ibadan, the University has metamorphosed to its current state, reflecting the institution’s journey of ambition, resilience, and a commitment to continuous improvement. To reiterate, the university’s distinct blue, white, and pink colors symbolize the institution’s values for knowledge, human development, creativity and prestige, and excellence. At the same time, the university’s emblem, which depicts a fusion of knowledge, self-reliance, and technological orientation, is not just a design but a representation of LCU’s enduring promise to its students in equipping them with the tools they need to navigate life’s complexities.

In its formative years, Lead City University set itself apart by adopting an academic model that was both innovative and inclusive. Unlike conventional universities that adhered to a one-size-fits-all approach, LCU introduced learning structures that accommodated working professionals, non-traditional students, and young scholars eager for a more practical learning experience. This unique flexibility over time has attracted a diverse student population, making the university a melting pot of ideas and aspirations.

Significantly, and with every sense of humility, it is worth mentioning that the academic offerings at LCU have grown in milestones over the years. What started as a modest selection of undergraduate programs across the two campuses has expanded into a comprehensive curriculum spanning disciplines such as Business Administration, Law, Engineering, Social Sciences, Computer Science, and Mass Communication. More recently, the university reached a significant milestone with the approval and accreditation of its Medical and Health Science programs, including Medicine and Surgery, Pharmacy, and Physiotherapy.

These additions have broadened the school’s academic reach and cemented its credibility as a serious player in Nigeria’s higher education landscape. This has brought much credence to the school, its parent body, and every stakeholder within its system. This is because achieving accreditation for these highly sought-after courses required a high-level strategic investment in infrastructure, faculty recruitment, and curriculum development. The intensity of these has further proven LCU’s unwavering commitment to quality education.

Beyond the classroom, LCU has been at the forefront of promoting an education system that extends beyond academic achievements. It is an apparent recognition that learning should not be confined to lectures and textbooks. To achieve this, the university has integrated entrepreneurship programs, skill acquisition initiatives, and industrial partnerships into its curriculum as a proactive measure for students to withstand today’s competitive job market, where traditional employment opportunities are increasingly fizzling out. It is a welcome development for a 21st-century school, as graduates need more than theoretical knowledge. They need adaptability, innovation, and more practical experience to fit in. It gladdens the heart to know that LCU understands this reality and has taken deliberate steps to ensure its students are equipped with these critical skills.

A defining aspect of the university’s impact over the past two decades has been its emphasis on accessibility. The tradition before was that private universities in Nigeria were often perceived as elitist due to their tuition costs and the social class that enrolled. At one point, there were similar issues with enrollment, as many were not convinced that it was a school their wards could attend.

To mitigate this, LCU has consistently worked to change the narratives by providing scholarships and financial aid to deserving indigent students. These scholarships, awarded based on merit and financial need, remind the institution of its commitment to inclusivity. These opportunities have been life-changing for many students who might have otherwise been unable to afford higher education. By ensuring that education remains within reach for those who need it most, LCU has once again demonstrated its commitment to shaping futures.

Looking at the trajectory and quality of academic delivery obtained in the school, one cannot salute the decision to have a well-grounded faculty. Faculty development has been another cornerstone of LCU’s success. After all, an institution is only as strong as the quality of its educators. Hence, there is a deliberate commitment to recruiting experienced lecturers, researchers, and industry professionals for its academic team. Over the years, the university has built a faculty that blends theoretical expertise with real-world experience. This approach ensures that students are not just taught from textbooks but are mentored by individuals who have made significant contributions in their respective fields. By fostering an environment of mentorship and academic research, the university has maintained high teaching standards, preparing students for professional and educational pursuits.

The physical transformation of Lead City University over the past twenty years is also worth noting. The university, which began with a modest campus, has since expanded into a thriving academic hub, complete with modern lecture halls, state-of-the-art laboratories, well-equipped libraries, and recreational facilities embedded in an architectural design that reflects a blend of tradition and modernity, creating an environment that is both inspiring and conducive to learning. These infrastructural developments are a testament to the university’s long-term vision to make learning conducive in a friendly atmosphere.

However, LCU’s journey has not been without challenges. Like all private institutions, it has had to navigate the complexities of Nigeria’s educational sector, including regulatory policies, economic fluctuations, and the evolving expectations of students and parents. For instance, the unpredictability of the country’s economy has often made financial planning difficult for the institution and its students. Yet, through strategic planning and resilience, LCU has continued to evolve, adapting to changes while maintaining its core mission.

The role of technology in education has also become increasingly significant in recent years, and LCU has recognized the need to integrate digital learning into its academic framework. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted educational systems globally and became a wake-up call for institutions to adopt more technologically driven learning methods. LCU strengthened its digital learning infrastructure, enabling students to continue their education remotely. The university’s investment in e-learning platforms, virtual labs, and online course delivery models reflects its readiness to embrace the future of education.

At one point, the university displayed mastery of digital tools to drive enrollment. This was in the wake of low enrollments, especially as very few citizens of Oyo State see the school as a prospect. During this period, the university had a large number of its students coming from outside the state. In response, the dedicated marketing teams deployed various traditional and digital tools, effectively utilizing social media, newsletters, and email marketing to achieve outstanding results. This is but a display of innovative thinking by a core department in the school.

As Lead City University celebrates its 20th anniversary, it is at a critical juncture that demands an even more significant commitment to innovation, research, and global academic engagement. The next phase of its journey will undoubtedly require a stronger emphasis on technological integration, expanded research initiatives, and deeper collaborations with local and international institutions. The university has already laid a strong foundation, but the challenge is to build upon it, ensuring that the next twenty years bring even more outstanding achievements.

Lead City at 20 is not just a celebration of longevity but a testament to the power of vision, perseverance, and growth; from a promising idea to a respected institution, LCU’s story is one of transformation and impact.

Looking ahead, the university must continue to evolve, keeping pace with global academic trends while staying true to its mission. Whether through the expansion of its research capabilities, increased industry collaborations, or the continued development of its students, LCU’s future is filled with possibilities. The past twenty years have been remarkable, but the next two decades hold even more significant potential.

For students, alums, faculty, and stakeholders, Lead City University is more than just an institution—it is a community, a movement, and a legacy in the making. As the university steps into the future, it does so with the same ambition and resolve that fueled its inception. The journey is far from over; in many ways, it is only just beginning.

. Falola is Professor Emeritus in the Humanities Lead City University.

Continue Reading

Top Stories