Opinion
Jimi Solanke: The Lifetime Of A Cultural Traditionalist
Published
11 months agoon
By Tunji Olaopa
I just must do this essay as a tribute to a man whose creative and rare talent I admire so much. I must confess, given the job that I now have, this essay was herculean. When one surveys the sociocultural history of Nigeria, and especially from ethnic and regional perspectives, like the South-West Yoruba people, one unmistakably will not fail to register the abiding presence of those—cultural propagators, promoters, producers and sustainers—whose critical efforts in long and unending and crosscutting trajectories have served as the touchstone to our cultural realities. Now this is a very crucial point for me. And I am gesturing towards the significance of globalization especially in the fragmentation and undermining of cultural importance through the homogenization of all things. When we speak about the world becoming a “global village,” we are confronted with the immediate value of the question of whose village it is becoming. And I suspect we all have a sense of the answer to this question. Factor Africa’s colonial past into this calculation, and you begin to see the dangers ahead.
And yet, we have those who have become our culture warriors in the face of the threatening effacement of cultural values; those who insist that culture matters even given the deluge of global phenomena, from digital technologies to artificial intelligence. I have in mind cultural figures like Hubert Ogunde, Wole Soyinka, Duro Ladipo, Akinwunmi Isola, Adebayo Faleti, Wande Abimbola, Ifayemi Elebuibon, Tunde Kelani, Bobby Benson, Niyi Osundare, Kola Ogunmola, Lagbaja, Asa, and Femi Osofisan. Wendell Pierce, the American actor, insists that “The role of culture is that it’s the form through which we as a society reflect on who we are, where we’ve been, where we hope to be.”
I am celebrating, with a mixed emotion, the person and personality of Jimi Solanke who just recently went to be with the ancestors. It is a mixed emotion for me because while realizing his humongous contributions as a culture producer and sustainer, this celebration is coming too late in time. I have, most sadly, further deepened the Yoruba adage that “Lọ́jọ́ a bá kú là ń dère; èèyàn ò sunwọ̀n láàyè” (we are only celebrated in death; no one is worth anything alive). My consolation is that it is never too late to give honour to whom it is due. And Jimi Solanke—Baba Agba—deserves all the honour and accolades we can heap on him, beyond gushing rhetoric and mere words. For more than fifty years, since he joined the department of Dramatic Arts at the then University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University), Uncle Jimi had dedicated his entire active professional life to propagating the Yoruba culture and its various values for a modern age.
Jimi Solanke was an all-rounder—folklorist, actor, storyteller, poet and playwright. And he was consummate in all. His songs pack the punch of cultural denotation and connotation. They are didactic and deep, filled with the density of the Yoruba cultural heritage. From “Owuro L’ojo” and “Eni bi Eni” to “Bere Mo’Le” and “Ororo Ile,” Uncle Jimi’s baritone voice combines with the rhythmic melodies to carry serious cultural messages. Two things are fascinating about Baba Agba’s songs. Apart from the deep songs in Yoruba, there is a code-switching style from English to Yoruba and back, that gives his songs a wider audience. I suspect that this is not just a ploy to gain more listeners but to reach across the generational divide between the old and the young with messages that often also transcend cultural boundaries. “Owuro L’ojo,” for instance, deploys Yorùbá linguistic and cultural terms to preach hard work and work values. The second thing is that he was a patriot who was concerned about the goodness of Nigeria. In “Ororo Ile,” he plays on the idea of ‘fatherland” and “a land flowing with milk and honey” to laud the possibilities in Nigeria.
His songs were stories that were entertaining and didactic. Baba Agba’s reputation was built around storytelling. Indeed, I think Donald Davis, the American storyteller and author, has Jimi Solanke in mind in describing himself: “Storytelling is not what I do for a living—it is how I do all that I do while I am living.” What more could be more significant than storytelling that weaves many elements of a people’s history into songs that gesture at so much potential and many directions? Humans are homo fabula—storytellers. But some have become adept at weaving stories into fabric of our collective existence. That is what Jimi Solanke did. From folklore to playwright, and from actor to singer, he embodies the persona of the cultural fabulist. I will put him side by side with the Greek Aeschylus. According to Robert McAfee Brown, “Storytelling is the most powerful way to put ideas into the world today.” But I think Uncle Jimi puts his connection to the cultural agenda even better: “If you lose the perspectives of your culture as an artist anywhere in the world and you lose the depths of your cultural perspectives – you can have nothing to sell.”
The intellectual and cultural maturation of Uncle Jimi Solanke is an amazing study in people-capital. From Orlando Julius, I. K. Dairo and Chris Ajilo, he learnt the rudiments of music; the Mbari group of Wole Soyinka, Christopher Okigbo, Ralph Opara, etc.—where, in his words, he became a “bigger boy”; the School of Drama at the University of Ibadan, with Jimi Johnson, Tunji Oyelana, Yomi Obileye, Bettie Okotie, and others as the first set of students under teachers like Geoffrey Axworthy as director, and Martin Banham, Joel Adedeji, Wole Soyinka (and the Olori Olokun theatre), and many significant others; and then to Ife to complete a professional formation under Ola Rotimi with drama (at the Olori Olokun theatre), Akin Euba with music, and Peggy Harper with dance. I had to go listen again to Uncle Jimi’s intro to Ralph Macdonald’s 1978 chartbuster, The Path (Ona La). Or sample the deep and mellifluous voice that sang “Barenijoye.”
It was as if orí deliberately directed him to Ife—to the mythological cradle of the Yorùbá race—for his multitalented grounding in the art forms. And it was a complete maturation that embedded him as a consummate artiste who was fit to carry the historic art of the Yorùbá storytellers and the burden of the Yoruba culture. And when the burden of disseminating the traditional heritage is hitched to the demand of getting the right audience to listen and take note, Baba Agba chose the strategy of narrating folktales to children, and we immediately begin to see the unfolding of an ideological function. Since children are the future, then it makes fundamental sense to reach them as the foundation of the sociocultural heritage we are trying to rescue. And it makes even more sense to reach them through the narration of the cultural imperatives and values through skillful and believable storytelling that not only entertains them in their own style, but also serves to keep the future about to be damaged by the unbridled offerings of digital technologies alive in the upbringing of these children. Through his famous programs, Storyland and African Stories, Baba Agba deployed what he called his “eternal tools”: folktales and folksongs to challenge a younger generation not to get lost in the cultural wasteland called globalization.
Jimi Solanke, Baba Agba, has gone to where the elders go. But the fight he joined and contributed to is still raging. Culture is still an endangered species in the rapidly unfolding global world. The youth care more about entertainment events on Instagram and YouTube than on cultural productions and values. Indeed, how many of Nigerian youths are familiar with Jimi Solanke and his cultural efforts? Or with other cultural propagators and producers like him? More fundamentally, what have values become in the age of the Gen Z? Many who belong in the age bracket of Baba Agba—and I must count myself in that generation too—are concerned about the degeneration in the value framework of the Nigerian society. Hardly can you get any moral exemplars again in a society where criminals and vagabonds have taken over the moral consciousness of the youth.
It is sad that figures like Uncle Jimi had to stand against the current of the moral and cultural decline occasioned by modernity. And yet, he did not give up, even given his octogenarian limitations. His passion and his noble agenda set him aside as one elder that the ancestors must take notice of when he arrives at the great beyond. And those of us still on this side of the divide—those of us who see the deep significance of the agenda he left behind, a commitment to the service of the Yoruba culture as a marker of our beingness in the world—cannot afford to abandon the task. It is too much to be set aside in the daily grind of our national existence. And the family is the starting point. From Aristotle to all the great philosophers, including those who are grounded in cultural frameworks, the family is everything; and a people’s culture grounds their humanity and relationship with others. It is the core of national unity that does not seem to have been foregrounded in our governance philosophy. In Uncle Olujimi Solanke, we have someone who tells us how to be a cultural traditionalist and a patriot.
Prof. Olaopa is the Chairman, Federal Civil Service Commission, Abuja.
You may like
-
Perspectives On Elon Musk As Reform Lead For US Federal Bureaucracy
-
Jibrin Ibrahim And The Shaping Of Nigeria’s Discursive Space
-
In ‘Katsina Declaration’, Civil Service Commissions Move To Reposition For Better Public Service
-
Nigerian Economic Society Honours Civil Service Commission Chair Olaopa
-
Reengineering The Bureaucracy As Engine Room Of Government
-
CIPM And The Unfinished Business Of Reform In The Public Service
By Leo Igwe
The Advocacy for Alleged Witches (AfAW) is concerned over the reported arrest of two men accused of being ‘witchdoctors’ in Zambia. The arrest underscores the potency of witchcraft fears and the connection between occult anxieties and the country’s politics. These individuals were accused of trying to bewitch the Zambian president, Hakainde Hichilema. The police claimed that they had charms. They planned to use the charms to harm the president. The report says the two persons have been charged under Zambia’s Witchcraft Act. The Act criminalizes “possession of charms”, “professing knowledge of witchcraft”, and “cruelty to wild animals”. The police found the two with assorted charms, including a live chameleon.
This development is utterly embarrassing and shows that the Zambian government is slowly losing its focus and bearing.The country has many socio-economic challenges. Suspicion of bewitchment or possession of charms should be the least of its worries at this time. There should be no place for witchcraft and possession of charms in modern politics because there is no evidence for these beliefs and practices. Zambian authorities should not weaponize the Witchcraft Act or use it to justify this incident. Zambian law does not recognize witchcraft. Zambia’s Witchcraft Act criminalizes naming or imputing witchcraft. It prohibits accusing or threatening to accuse any person of being a witch or a wizard. In this case, it is the police who are breaking the law.
Otherwise, how did they know the two individuals were ‘witchdoctors’? Did these persons identify as witch doctors? If not, the police are liable because they named and imputed witchcraft and have to prove that these individuals have witch-doctoring powers. The police claimed to have charged these individuals for possessing “assorted charms”, including a chameleon. Really?
The police in Zambia have questions to answer: What are charms? How did they know that what was in their possession were charms, not pets? Is a chameleon a form of charm? What makes possession of a chameleon possession of a charm? When and how does a chameleon become a charm? The police need to answer these questions and more before one takes them seriously.
Again, did the individuals describe what was in possession as ‘charms’? If they did, does confessing or designating something as a charm make it a charm? And if they did not, the police are liable because they need to prove how those possessions translated into charms.
In addition, the police claimed that the duo wanted to bewitch the president. What does that mean? How did they know? Are the police not contravening a provision under the Witchcraft Act by professing knowledge of witchcraft? Can one harm another person using a chameleon? They claimed that the two persons wanted to use the charms in their possession, including the chameleon to harm the president. How did they know that? What is the evidence for that?
The Advocacy for Alleged Witches calls for an end to this state-sponsored witch hunt. There is no evidence of harm through witchcraft or charms. The Zambian government should desist from witchcraft- related infractions and violations including arbitrary arrest, and detention of innocent citizens. These allegations are baseless and absurd. The arrest was politically motivated. This development demonstrates that Zambian authorities are out of sync with their duty and obligation to uphold the rule of law and protect accused persons.
Zambian authorities need to act in compliance with the 2021 UN resolution, which urged states to take measures to combat abuses linked to witchcraft beliefs and ritual attacks. End witchcraft allegations in Zambia. End witch hunts in Africa now!
Dr Igwe directs the Advocacy for Alleged Witches.
By Tony Afejuku
The other burning issue, apart from Farotimi and Babalola’s, which I wish to take a look at – and which I am taking a look at now – relates to what is happening in our capital territory. What is this burning issue – which our human rightists and civil society organisations and personages are surprisingly and un-satisfactorily not inclined to focus attention on and examine as they should? I may be wrong, but it surely seems to me that this issue, this burning issue, which is of more importance than Farotimi and Babalola’s – which has been given undue adulation – is deliberately being neglected and depreciated by proclaimers and heroes and heroines of human rights, justice, equity and equality of rights in your country my country our country. Why, why, why and why, why, why? Anyone who has any iota of patriotic sensibility, feeling and judgment well watered and buttressed by a very great influence upon his or her critical judgment will keep on asking the question I am asking.
Mr. Nyesom Wike, as almost everybody who can read and write a little knows, is the current minister of your, my and our Federal Capital Territory. His post or office is akin to that of a governor of a state. As the immediate past governor of Rivers State who was drafted, after his two terms there expired, to continue in the FCT as its new minister-governor or governor-minister under the auspices of a party he is not a true member of, Mr. Wike cannot but be seen as a lucky man. He is in every possible and impossible way. Minister-Governor Wike is a lucky man and a very fortunate one indeed. No former governor of Rivers State (or of any Nigerian state), as far as I know, has achieved what the famed political rouser of rabbles has achieved in one short gubernatorial life-time, and at a relatively young and fertile age. His dual achievement with and in two different political parties at this delicate point of Nigerian politics indicates to our politicians and us all that there is always time for a reminder that there are ready-made high rewards for arch-angels of betrayals. And Mr. Wike may go down in Rivers and Nigerian history as both an arch-angel and an emperor of betrayal of us all if we attempt to indicate what I have defined here as his dual achievement.
We can roughly divide, briefly, Wike’s political development into two periods. During the first, excluding his lower political positions before he became the governor of Rivers State, he quickly adapted his style to that of an emperor who became a rabble-rouser of rabble-rousers whose gubernatorial efficiency moved from stiffness to stiffness. He did not at any time feel that he needed suppleness to govern Rivers State. “Let the heavens fall if they must fall!” We are not there yet in this attempted analysis of the stiff-hearted and stiff-minded one. True? But he is already demonstrating this characteristic in Abuja. False? Judge and give the answer yourself.
Even after he left Rivers State a short while ago as governor, he is still trying to control happenings there to the political discomfiture of his hand-picked successor, his erstwhile “boy” and “son” – with whom he has fallen out. As the minister-governor or governor-minister of the FCT, Wike is occupied with the other taste of the emperor-juggernaut formulator – doing the work of two key political masters in one room and desk of political jugglery. Since his appearance in the FCT, minister-governor or governor-minister Wike has allegedly attempted to recover or transform for Abuja what is not traditionally or socially Abuja’s, for example, the city’s social idiom and landscape and terrain as well as its environs. In doing this he sometimes over-steps his bounds and mark of human/inhuman decency/indecency and psychological understanding of human nature, if you follow well what I am saying; he has so far become at best not really better than a typical pedestrian Nigerian lawyer and officer of political power: in his explorations so far in the Federal Capital Territory we have come to the realization, as T. S. Eliot would say, that “it is so often true that only by going too far can we find out how far we can go.” But one has to be a very negatively obstinate and self-serving emperor and a thorough-bred arch-angel of betrayal of the people and masses to justify such perilous and perfidious expeditions and adventures.
Last week, I saw on Arise Television “The Morning Show” Chief Rita Lori-Ogbebor, the dutiful widow of the late Nigerian supreme patriot and soldier, Colonel Ogbebor (of Benin stock) battling, so to say, to wrest the legacy of her late husband from the tight grip of the adventurous FCT minister-governor who has registered his name and signature in the hearts and consciousness of the people as the depriver of their possessions. The three anchors of “The Morning Show” were in their respective ways splendid in their structures of remarks and questions to Chief (Mrs.) Rita Lori-Ogbebor whom I have had occasions in times past to call patriotically Rita A-K 47 on account of her natural right to fire her beautiful tongue at any person, usually an enemy, of just actions. When she made the case she made to protect the estate of Paulosa Nigeria Limited, her late husband’s aforesaid legacy in the FCT, she was in her natural territory, habitat and element where even at age eighty-four, she never ever loses her stability – although she unusually restrained herself in the Arise Television appearance. Dr. Reuben Abati, Rufai Oseni, and Ayo Mairo-Ese clearly explored seriously but delightfully the mind of the mother-hen of Warri – my other coinage and appellation I gave her in my poetry. Her “The Morning Show” appearance enabled me to see the poignant cry de profundis of the FCT inhabitants whose property and residences in different guises have been demolished. She did not say anything that was out of joint. She spoke and came out as a mother, protector and symbol of the people who have suffered – and are suffering – from the state of affliction and anguish Wike’s demolitions have placed – and are placing – the people.
Ojy Okpe in her delicious and delectable “What is Trending” slot on the same show, showed without exaggeration but with further elaboration what people in and outside Abuja/FCT think of the mighty Wike’s demolitions, a burning issue that the Senate has asked “Let Heaven Fall” minister-governor Wike to halt as the committee the Senate set up on the issue starts its work. Of course, we cannot but assume that Chief Rita Lori-Ogbebor, Mrs. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan as well as Mrs. Ireti Kingigbe, the senator representing the FCT in the Senate and other patriotic senators diligently did what they did on the floor of the Senate when the burning issue was tabled for debate with the gracious understanding and authorization of the Senate President.
I need to state further that the “The Morning Show” anchors did well and extremely so by giving the minister-governor the opportunity to air his anti-Paulosa story. His senior special assistant on public communication and social media, Mr. Olalere Olayinka, stood in for him. After he gave the reasons for the clamp-down, his responses to the questions the anchors put to him followed the usual pattern of denials by artificial men in power – denials that they always use to intimidate and betray the people. In fact, Mr. Olayinka’s ploy to ride easily over our dear Rufai Oseni, a wholesome representative of the deprived, that the chap (or is it guy?) and his boss always employ their colloquial speeches and remarks to dishonor, failed. Yes, the ploy failed woefully. In stanza after stanza of the exchanges between Mr. Olayinka and the Arise anchors, he deteriorated – and his deterioration was hall-marked when he unwittingly revealed that the Paulosa land had been acquired by his minister-governor’s close cohort, an act that was nothing short of gross abuse of power and authority.
Because the Senate is already using its authority, power and privilege to resolve the burning issue, hopefully, in a way that the late Colonel Ogbebor’s legacy and family will not be subjected to any kind of degradation, I will utter no more words for now. I trust, however, that the liberties the Senate is taking – or has taken – are for the sake of order to favour the down-trodden.
As for the minister-governor, the PDP emperor at large, here is an immortal quote from Marcus Aurelius, the magnificent and authentic Roman Emperor and philosopher (A.D. 121-180): “If it is not right, do not do it; if it is not true, do not say it.” You lose nothing by giving us a slice of your humanity by your right acts and correct words. Everything changes and passes. Be humane as a human being.
Afejuku can be reached via 08055213059.
By Leo Igwe
Recently, I facilitated a critical thinking workshop at the Bay Wreath Schools in Lagos. The theme was critical thinking and teacher development. As the theme stated, the workshop was on teaching, about teaching, and for teachers. It highlighted the pedagogical value of critical and reflective inquiry. The workshop exposed teachers to critical mental habits and skills. It emphasized how critical thinking would enhance expertise in the learning and delivery of subjects in classrooms.
I used the opportunity to discuss questionstorm as a method of teaching and learning. Questionstorm is a way that I operationalized critical thinking for primary and elementary schools. Questionstorm is the ability to interrogate all objects and materials. It is a habit of questioning ideas and experiences in all areas of human endeavor. Simply put, questionstorm is a question-driven inquiry. Children are naturally curious. They thirst for knowledge and understanding. Unfortunately, the school system kills children’s curiosity and dampens their interrogative appetite. The school system places much emphasis on rote learning and memorization. It makes the generation of answers not questions or problems the test of knowledge, and the determinant of intelligence. Teaching is largely a drudgery, a monotonous exercise, and a process of depositing knowledge on passive recipients, the students. Teaching entails dumping information on learners whose duty is to cram and reproduce during tests or examinations.
This teaching praxis has been criticized and blamed for the poor performance of students post-school (college and university) and their inability to think independently, creatively, and innovatively. Other teaching methods have tried to address these gaps and limitations. There have been suggestions to make teaching and instruction more active, and more student/learner/child-centered. One such method is the Montessori method. The Montessori method discourages grades and tests as ways of measuring achievement or determining intelligence and excellence. It emphasizes hands-on learning and the development of real-world skills. While the Montessori method stresses the practical approach to learning it says very little about the authoritarian teacher-to-student approach that is the mainstay of teaching and learning in classrooms. Teaching follows a pattern that leaves students and learners in the margins and unable to question and contribute to the learning process. Teachers present what is to be learned such as a text, and then generate questions that students respond or address to demonstrate knowledge of what has been taught. The student’s or learner’s main job is to answer questions, to look for or find answers or solutions. The teacher’s work is to get students to look for, and provide answers, and reproduce what they have been taught or told. But students are answer-depots. Students are not memory banks or reserves. They are active minds and thinking agents.
With questionstorm as a teaching method, the mode of instruction would change. Teaching becomes a cooperative endeavor that actively involves teachers and students. What is taught in the classroom is a collaborative note, not the teacher’s note, not a handout to students. Teachers present or generate texts or objects for learning, in response to intense questioning of the object or material by students, teachers provide information as required for that subject, topic, level, and time frame. No two instances of teaching – of the same topic or subject- are or should be the same because the input of students and teachers is not predetermined.
This is because of an overlooked principle in teaching and learning, that I call the “uncertainty principle”.
The uncertainty principle underlies questionstorm because knowledge is not fixed. Learning is a fluid process. All that is to be learned is uncertain, it is unknown and never determined. No teacher can say beforehand what is to be taught or learned because no one knows exactly the questions and answers or replies that would arise when a topic is presented or taught in a particular class. A topic or learning material elicits unique responses and exchanges that both teachers and students cannot exactly know or predict a priori, before the fact.
Teaching is a shared task and responsibility. Class notes are fluid materials. They are not texts cast on educational stones and delivered by teachers to students to copy, cut, and paste as is often the case. Class notes are not written or produced by teachers for students but by teachers with students. Teachers’ notes are incomplete and insufficient. They account only for a part, not a whole of the learning process and material. Students’ input completes and complements the teaching material and learning process. Thus every class note is unique because it is a product of a specific collaborative endeavor, a product of particular teaching and learning agents and circumstances that cannot be repeated or replicated.
Thus, as a teaching method, questionstorm is set to facilitate teacher development and improve the quality of instruction in schools. Questionstorm will help realize a paradigm shift in education and learning. I hope educators, teachers, and school managers will embrace this method of teaching and learning.
Dr Igwe directs the Critical Thinking Social Empowerment Foundation.
Inline image
NEW TIMES CULTURE
Fear Of Witchcraft And Politics In Zambia
Black Saturday As 10 Confirmed Dead, Others Injured In Abuja Church Stampede
Tinubu Congratulates Civil Service Commission Chair Olaopa As He Turns 65
Top Stories
-
Latest News1 day ago
Black Saturday As 10 Confirmed Dead, Others Injured In Abuja Church Stampede
-
Opinion22 hours ago
Fear Of Witchcraft And Politics In Zambia
-
Opinion3 days ago
Burning Issues: (FCT Minister And Paulosa) (2)
-
Metro3 days ago
AfAW Decries Court Acquittal Of Suspected Murderer Of Alleged Witch In Enugu
-
Latest News5 days ago
Why We Set Up Kojola Dry Port – Abiodun