Connect with us

Opinion

A Philosopher’s Spiritual Journey And Bertrand Russell’s Influence

Published

on

Professionals In Government: Issues In Navigating The Policy Space In Nigeria

By

 Tunji Olaopa

 

For those familiar with the writings of Bertrand Russell, the eponymous British mathematical genius and one of the defining philosophical figures of the twentieth century, the title of this piece would seem to suggest a false dichotomy between Russell’s hardboiled philosophical template and spirituality. British philosophical tradition was founded on empiricism as a defining framework. Starting from John Locke and down to Russell and many successors, empiricism latches on to a scientific mindset that sees reality in terms of hard sense data, rather than spiritual essence that defines the rationalism of Plato, Descartes and Hegel. However, this essay is not about the philosophical differences between empiricism and rationalism, or even the fine grains of Russell’s empiricism. On the contrary, it is to outline the paradoxical effect that Russell’s hardboiled scientific empiricism had on my philosophical and spiritual maturation as a scholar and a person. In so doing, I am responding to passionate requests from a growing number of my readers who being believers want me to share some perspectives on how my seminal orientation had shaped my Christianity. I must however apologise upfront, that tried as I did to make this piece the most reader-friendly, it ended up more a seminal than a general reader’s delight

By now, those who have followed my public commentaries are aware of those historical figures that have had the most fundamental influence on my intellectual coming of age. References to Plato have peppered all my public writings. And that is because Plato constitutes a singular most important philosopher that initiated my first philosophical wondering. It is from Plato that I got my first inkling of what it means to think about reform. But it is from Martin Luther and Thomas More that I learnt not only about the depth of activism but also the content of the utopia that reform aims at. With Bertrand Russell—mathematician, philosopher and Nobel Prize winner—I got a different kind of motivation.

READ ALSO: Adedotun Phillips And The Unfinished Business Of Reform In Nigeria

My journey into Russell’s essential works, outside of Principia Mathematica and other contributions to the philosophy of mathematics and logic, began at a point when I was getting acutely confused about the multiplicity of religious practices to which I had been exposed, the contentions in their claims, and how they could be arranged to form a coherent whole for someone like me who was looking for spiritual meaning. My mind has always been conditioned by a search for spiritual enlightenment and existential coherence within which I could fit my wondering queries about the world and all its manifold realities. There have been two sides to my spiritual wanderings. The first has to do with my confused attempt at understanding the relationship between Christianity, mysticism and occultism. In other words, how does the desire to know Christ, for instance, lead Christianity into mysticism? How does, for example, Tibetan occultism and its interest in self-consciousness relate with the abasement of the self in Christianity? When I eventually unearthed Albert Einstein’s connection with Rosicrucianism, I became all the more perplexed as to how such a genius could be wrong in his choice of spiritual path. How could Rosicrucianism be wrong? Indeed, how could the Ifá corpus by which the Yoruba lived for centuries not be a means by which one could understand one’s world?

The second dimension to my spiritual wandering came as a result of my early encounter with Pentecostalism and its brand of theological exclusivity. Pentecostal Christianity seems to have satisfied my youthful search for religious puritanism. I was however seriously offended by the common knowledge that Christian clerics dabbled in occult practices to enhance their religious status. But then, I came short when I confronted the simplistic fixation with the miracle mentality that gave Pentecostalism its leeway into postcolonial sensibilities, as well as prosperity theology and all its obscene manifestations. It was at this point that I started dangling at the precipice of agnosticism, after all, I had read all of Lobsang Rampa’s Tibetan mysticism and dabbled in Rosicrucianism in my student days. All these offered their own unique spiritual titillation for my wandering mind. How then do I deal with the absolutism of Pentecostal Christianity, and its puritanical exclusivity? How then do I reach the divine?

READ ALSO: Rebuilding Nigeria’s Broken Walls: From Emotional Patriotism To Nehemiah Complex

And this was the worst possible time to be fascinated with Bertrand Russell as a budding intellectual and believer! This was a philosopher and professed atheist. His Why I Am Not a Christian (1927) outlined his many logical arguments against Christian theology, Christ, immortality and even God. He argued, till death, that religion was essentially harmful to human flourishing because it was founded on fear. However, it is Russell’s philosophical methodology that paradoxically assisted in my achieving a religious open-mindedness that opened my path to spiritual enlightenment eventually. Russell was instrumental in the founding of the analytic school of philosophy, alongside Ludwig Wittgenstein, Gottlob Frege, Karl Popper, W. V. O. Quine, G. E. Moore, and many others. The tradition is characterized by its dependence on analysis, logical argumentations and clarity of thought. Analysis implies taking an issue and focusing philosophical reflection on its constituent parts in a way that enable an understanding of the whole. Analytic philosophers aim for conceptual clarity. Philosophical puzzles are the result of linguistic misuse.

With Bertrand Russell, logical argumentation became the foundation of clarity in social and political matters. At the core of my fascination with Russell’s empiricism is an epistemological skepticism that insists that we see our beliefs as just a starting point for any actions we wish to take; beliefs are just guides that should be scrutinized seriously. They are not absolute in any way. Russell called on what Alfred Henry Lloyd, the American philosopher, called the “will to doubt.” In the lecture, “Free Thought and Official Propaganda” (1922), Russell wrote:

None of our beliefs are quite true; all have at least a penumbra of vagueness and error. The methods of increasing the degree of truth in our beliefs are well known; they consist in hearing all sides, trying to ascertain all the relevant facts, controlling our own bias by discussion with people who have the opposite bias, and cultivating a readiness to discard any hypothesis which has proved inadequate

READ ALSO: Tenure Policy Restoration In The Federal Service: Matters Arising

This principle of skepticism led Russell to agnosticism. On the contrary, it led me to faith. Agnosticism was too steep a commitment for me. But I saw the logical point of Russell’s argument. With the will to doubt, fundamentalism becomes an epistemic position that cannot be sustained. On a supposition, it excludes all other possible alternatives of faith. Thus, with Russell’s relentless dedication to logical inquiry and philosophic curiosity, I gradually began to surmount my leaning towards religious puritanism in ways that gave me spiritual clarity. A significant part of that derived from my upbringing as a Yoruba Baptist who grew up within a context of traditional inter-faith relations, what Ali Mazrui famously regarded as Africa’s triple heritage. This was a tradition that implicitly insisted on “live and let live” in terms of religious tolerance. Without the need for Russell, the traditional Yoruba epistemic framework provides an accommodationist ambience that allowed religious manifestations to coexist peaceably.

Under the deep influence of a good dose of Russell’s philosophic arguments for fallibility, there was no way I could afford religious fundamentalism, even with my attachment to Pentecostal Christianity and its absolutist theology. Indeed, I began to see clearly how I could begin to relate to my fascination especially with Yoruba spirituality. The implication of fallibility for me is that I could hold on to my belief while not disdaining other beliefs. In other words, being a Pentecostal Christian, for me, is my own leap of faith and mine alone. It does not commit me to an absolutist rejection of the religious beliefs of others. This has some far-reaching implications for my intellectual and spiritual maturation. Most significantly, Russell’s counsel of rigorous logical argumentation and the idea of fallibility makes me a more reflective and, I think, better Christian. This means that it opens up within me an open-minded space that allows for more empathetic relationship with those whose beliefs are unlike mine.

This becomes a sine qua non not just for me as a private individual with a religious belief, but also as a public intellectual with an aspiration to mediate in the making of a freer and more flexible marketplace of ideas and opinions. This is where Bertrand Russell’s opposition to pubic censorship and rabid support for freedom of opinion becomes a cornerstone. Being a public intellectual comes with a range of intellectual and epistemic burdens. Being trusted to distil ideas on several realms of thoughts makes her an embodiment of a fundamental striving between personal prejudices and public requirements; essentially, she is confronted with a limitation of her knowledge even to the extent that she wields the power to influence others. To borrow the title of Robin Sharma, a public intellectual is a “leader who had no title.” This appeals to me tremendously, especially within the context of the craze by Nigerian elites for political appointments that do not amount to any fundamental transformation of people’s lives, and that are riddled with ethnic biases and religious prejudices.

The public sphere—the home of the public intellectual—offers a more significant space for fundamental ideational conversations that are founded on a fallibility-induced humility, unconditioned by petty ethnic rivalries. This for me represents a microcosm of what, in my little book, The Joy of Learning (2010), I called an enlarged mentality that enabled a learning to live together in society. This kind of learning goes beyond learning to know and learning to do to a broader understanding of the interdependent relationship among people of different persuasions and values. In a final sense, Bertrand Russell sowed into me the seed of an epistemic humility that flows from my religious open-mindedness to the significance of ideational reciprocity for the effectiveness of my reform advocacy. No reform idea can ever survive if it fails to tap into the open space where the global and the local, the government and the nongovernmental are relating coherently. That is how far Bertrand Russell drove me to engage with my own thoughts and biases. I am the better for it, trust me.

Olaopa is a retired Federal Permanent Secretary , and Professor of public administration, National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru, Jos . tolaopa2003@gmail.com

 

Read more authentic news on our social media platforms

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Opinion

Stellenbosch: Senzeni Na And Decolonizing Secularity In Africa

Published

on

Witch Burning, Impunity And Abuses Linked to Witchcraft Beliefs In Benue State
Dr Leo Igwe

By Leo Igwe

In December, I attended a workshop on Decolonizing Secularity in Africa. It was one of my best conferences because it highlighted issues that have worried me over the years. For the first time, I attended an academic conference on religion or secularism in Africa that featured a panel on atheism and humanism in Africa. Organized by Point Sud, this workshop was held at Stellenbosch in South Africa. Interestingly I did not know about Stellenbosch’s colonial history and significance. So I could say with the benefit of hindsight that the choice of Stellenbosch as a venue for this event was adequate. The goal of the workshop was, based on the coloniality of secularity, to interrogate the “liberating force of religion, the secular in ethnic nationalisms, and the ideologies of culturalization, not least in its current revenant, heritagization, in Africa and beyond”. It was great to meet, discuss, and exchange ideas on colonization, decolonization, religion, and secularity with scholars and activists from different parts of the continent and the world. Many issues that emerged at the conference have continued to agitate my mind. First is the so much emphasis on colonization. I have continued to wonder: Can’t we meaningfully discuss African issues without alluding to colonialism? Again, reference is always made to Western colonialism. What about Eastern and other forms? Many parts of America were colonized at one point or the other. Weren’t they? The same with Europe, Asia, and Oceania. But it is only in the case of Africa that there is an overemphasis on Western colonialism. Incidentally, many African scholars have unwittingly joined in explaining Africa through the lens of colonialism, western colonialism.

The fixation on colonialism is not without a reason. I attended an African studies conference some years ago and someone alluded to a comment by a Western scholar, that regarding Africa, before colonialism, there was nothing. There was nothing? I was shocked to hear that comment. Look, that I do not know or nobody knows about a period in history, does not mean that there was nothing. Is it not better to say I do not know than to make such a dimwitted statement? What applies to Africa, applies to other places in the world. There are stages in their histories nobody knows what happened. Or what is known is patchy. That should not be a reason to say that there was nothing.

One issue that engaged attendees was the meaning of ‘decolonizing’. What does it mean to decolonize? Some define decolonization as removing or undoing colonial elements and influences. And if that is the case, what do we remove or undo? And who does that and Why? how do we undo the Western colonial linguistic influence? What about the eastern and other colonial elements? Is it possible or feasible to remove or undo all colonial influences? By the way, is religion or secularity as introduced to Africa decolonized?

Some participants argued that decolonizing secularity implied going back in time before colonialism. So, how far can we go and why? In the process won’t we go back to that time “when there was nothing?” Can’t we decolonize without returning to the past? Can’t we decolonize looking forward and not backward? Is religion or secularity not an embodiment of layers of influences over the years? If we were to peel off these ‘colonial’ elements, what would be left? Some propose a return to the indigenous forms of secularity or religion as the case may be. The question is this: What does indigenous mean? Who defines or determines it? Is the indigenous the same for all? What is considered indigenous to South Africans may not be to Kenyans, Nigerians, or Malians. What is considered indigenous in a part of Nigeria may be a legacy of the colonial influence by another part of Nigeria. So what is indigenous to Africa is not monolithic and regionally applicable.

That leads me to another controversial issue that came up at the workshop, which is, one secularity or multiple secularities. Some of the participants especially those from the Department of Religion, at the University of Cape Town were of the view that there was one secularity, that is the western secularity is manifesting in other climes, in different forms. While other participants from Europe leaned towards the notion of multiple secularities highlighting forms of distinction and differentiation between religion and other social domains across cultures. Although secularism or secularity is Western in origin, what the concept represents manifests in other cultures and societies. Secularities predate Western secularity or manifest and feature in ways that do not fit into or align with Western secularity.

As I noted earlier, there have been colonialisms before Western colonialism. There have been secularities before Western secularity. Although Western colonialism brought the influence of western religion and secularity to bear on various cultures and societies, the colonial encounter does not negate the social differentiation of religion and other domains in these societies. It is only in seeing or articulating secularity in its multiple forms that these situations, dynamics, and intersections could adequately be captured. So, the concept of multiple secularities has enormous explanatory power. It is useful and helpful in highlighting the social distinction of religion and other domains in cultures and societies beyond the West.

For instance, western missionaries introduced christianity and the Christian god to Africa. What we have is one Christianity or Islam manifesting in different forms. Africans have adapted and reinvented the Christian religion over the years, hence the notion of African Christianities. Again while western Christian missionaries introduced Christian religion or religiosity, they did not introduce religion. religiosity, or the idea of god. There are other religiosities apart from and beyond Christianities/Christian religiosities. There are other gods and deities beyond the Christian god/deity. I think the idea of multiple secularities or multiple religiosities has much more descriptive value.

Another issue that came up at the event, not surprisingly so, was apartheid. One of the presenters analyzed the song, Senzeni Na (What have we done?) to buttress his point. I have never heard of the song. I didn’t know its relevance to the anti-apartheid struggle. In the course of the discussions, it was noted how other Africans including Nigerians are not conscious or sensitive to the pains of apartheid. I noticed from the expressions of some South Africans at the meeting that they were not happy with the nonchalant attitudes of Nigerians towards their experience. I believe that black South Africans are right to feel that way. The apartheid was a tragic experience that still hurts blacks in contemporary South Africa. The painful memories won’t quickly go away. Black South Africans should also understand that Nigerians have a different history and experience. They should also not forget that the Nigerian and other African governments contributed a lot to the anti-apartheid struggle. Nigeria supported Nelson Mandela and other heroes and heroines of the struggle.

Many South Africans do not relate to the tragedy of the Rwandan genocide as Rwandans do. They do not relate to the pain and trauma of the Nigerian civil war. In meetings and conferences, they treat these experiences and encounters lightly because these experiences were not a part of their history. As I noted during my conversations with some of the attendees, while I appreciate the pain and trauma of apartheid, Black South Africans must learn to move on because as they say in the Igbo language, Nke chi ka, meaning, the one yet to come, the future one, the one that belongs to tomorrow, is greater. The greatness of South Africa does not lie in the past but in its tomorrow, in its future. It does not mean that we should not refer or draw from the past. We should and we must. But South Africa is not returning to those days when Senzeni Na was sung. The country is forging ahead and moving towards a better and more glorious future.

This song provides a thrust for this forward and onward movement. It highlights the challenges that South Africans face and are facing. But more importantly, this song codifies the pain and suffering of all humans because all oppressed people everywhere; all who suffer persecution within and without South Africa are singing, Senzeni Na.

Igwe, PhD,  was a co-convener of Decolonizing Secularity in Africa, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 9–13 December 2024.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Commonwealth Day 2025: Together We Can End Witch Hunts And Ritual Attacks

Published

on

Witch Burning, Impunity And Abuses Linked to Witchcraft Beliefs In Benue State
Dr Leo Igwe

By Leo Igwe

As we mark Commonwealth Day 2025, the Advocacy for Alleged Witches protests witch hunts and ritual attacks in Commonwealth countries, and the refusal of the Commonwealth to speak out against these abuses. In many parts of Africa, Asia and Oceania witch hunting is not a thing of the past but an ongoing wave of abuses and violations. In Commonwealth countries such as Ghana, Nigeria, Kenya, Papua New Guinea, persecution of alleged witches rages with force and ferocity. In Ghana, witch persecution results in the displacement of accused persons who then flee to some make shift shelters known as “witch camps”. Those who could not flee to these places like Akua Denteh are murdered in cold blood.

Witchcraft accusation is a form of death sentence for the accused and accused people are sometimes extrajudicially killed despite existing legislations in these countries. Witch trials take place in many countries of the Commonwealth. Trial by ordeal and jungle justice are meted out to the accused. Some weeks ago, an elderly woman who had dementia was accused of witchcraft and beaten to death in Nigeria. In Malawi, alleged witches are stoned to death. In Zambia some political opponents suspected of trying to kill the president using ‘witchcraft’ are standing trial at the state court. Alleged witches, mainly women, children and people with disabilities are attacked, banished, lynched, buried alive or tortured to confess to the ‘crime of witchcraft’.

Witch hunting persists because many countries and groups of countries like the Commonwealth have refused to speak out against these atrocities. The Commonwealth should break its silence on witch hunts and ritual attacks in member countries. It should join the UN in condemning these horrific abuses. The Commonwealth should add its voice to this campaign. It should highlight witch persecution and witch hunting during its meetings and summits. It should call for an end to abuses linked to witchcraft beliefs and ritual attacks. The Commonwealth Day should be an opportunity to recommit to ending this menace. It provides a platform to rally all countries against these violations. No nation should be left behind in the quest to make witch hunting history around the globe.

Together we can end witch hunts and ritual attacks in Commonwealth countries.

Igwe, PhD, directs the Advocacy for Alleged Witches.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Lead City @20: The Past And The Present

Published

on

Dele Jegede In Conversation With Prince Yemisi Shyllon
Prof. Toyin Falola

By Toyin Falola

Our university is now an adult at 20!

About twenty-two years ago, the vision to redefine the frontiers of private education in Nigeria led to the conceptualization of the idea, which birthed a new direction for education. The thoughts and projections of like-minded educators and academic experts led to the establishment of Lead City University (LCU) as a beacon for progressive education in Nigeria. This development came when access to higher education was limited by rigid institutional structures and to federal, state, and a handful of private institutions.

At inception, LCU was envisioned as an academic environment that was expected to balance flexibility with skills and academic excellence. On this note, the university became fully operational in 2005, having scaled through necessary procedures for establishment. Since then, the university has positioned itself as an institution willing to break conventional norms by offering programs that blend theoretical learning with practical application. The goal was clear—to bridge the gap between academia and the real-world demands of the job market, ensuring that students graduated with certificates, competence, and confidence. Hence the word “enterprise graduate”.

Two decades later, Lead City University has become a household name in private tertiary education in Nigeria and earned the trust of parents, guardians, students, and the education community. From its humble beginnings with two campuses around Jericho and Challenge areas of Ibadan, the University has metamorphosed to its current state, reflecting the institution’s journey of ambition, resilience, and a commitment to continuous improvement. To reiterate, the university’s distinct blue, white, and pink colors symbolize the institution’s values for knowledge, human development, creativity and prestige, and excellence. At the same time, the university’s emblem, which depicts a fusion of knowledge, self-reliance, and technological orientation, is not just a design but a representation of LCU’s enduring promise to its students in equipping them with the tools they need to navigate life’s complexities.

In its formative years, Lead City University set itself apart by adopting an academic model that was both innovative and inclusive. Unlike conventional universities that adhered to a one-size-fits-all approach, LCU introduced learning structures that accommodated working professionals, non-traditional students, and young scholars eager for a more practical learning experience. This unique flexibility over time has attracted a diverse student population, making the university a melting pot of ideas and aspirations.

Significantly, and with every sense of humility, it is worth mentioning that the academic offerings at LCU have grown in milestones over the years. What started as a modest selection of undergraduate programs across the two campuses has expanded into a comprehensive curriculum spanning disciplines such as Business Administration, Law, Engineering, Social Sciences, Computer Science, and Mass Communication. More recently, the university reached a significant milestone with the approval and accreditation of its Medical and Health Science programs, including Medicine and Surgery, Pharmacy, and Physiotherapy.

These additions have broadened the school’s academic reach and cemented its credibility as a serious player in Nigeria’s higher education landscape. This has brought much credence to the school, its parent body, and every stakeholder within its system. This is because achieving accreditation for these highly sought-after courses required a high-level strategic investment in infrastructure, faculty recruitment, and curriculum development. The intensity of these has further proven LCU’s unwavering commitment to quality education.

Beyond the classroom, LCU has been at the forefront of promoting an education system that extends beyond academic achievements. It is an apparent recognition that learning should not be confined to lectures and textbooks. To achieve this, the university has integrated entrepreneurship programs, skill acquisition initiatives, and industrial partnerships into its curriculum as a proactive measure for students to withstand today’s competitive job market, where traditional employment opportunities are increasingly fizzling out. It is a welcome development for a 21st-century school, as graduates need more than theoretical knowledge. They need adaptability, innovation, and more practical experience to fit in. It gladdens the heart to know that LCU understands this reality and has taken deliberate steps to ensure its students are equipped with these critical skills.

A defining aspect of the university’s impact over the past two decades has been its emphasis on accessibility. The tradition before was that private universities in Nigeria were often perceived as elitist due to their tuition costs and the social class that enrolled. At one point, there were similar issues with enrollment, as many were not convinced that it was a school their wards could attend.

To mitigate this, LCU has consistently worked to change the narratives by providing scholarships and financial aid to deserving indigent students. These scholarships, awarded based on merit and financial need, remind the institution of its commitment to inclusivity. These opportunities have been life-changing for many students who might have otherwise been unable to afford higher education. By ensuring that education remains within reach for those who need it most, LCU has once again demonstrated its commitment to shaping futures.

Looking at the trajectory and quality of academic delivery obtained in the school, one cannot salute the decision to have a well-grounded faculty. Faculty development has been another cornerstone of LCU’s success. After all, an institution is only as strong as the quality of its educators. Hence, there is a deliberate commitment to recruiting experienced lecturers, researchers, and industry professionals for its academic team. Over the years, the university has built a faculty that blends theoretical expertise with real-world experience. This approach ensures that students are not just taught from textbooks but are mentored by individuals who have made significant contributions in their respective fields. By fostering an environment of mentorship and academic research, the university has maintained high teaching standards, preparing students for professional and educational pursuits.

The physical transformation of Lead City University over the past twenty years is also worth noting. The university, which began with a modest campus, has since expanded into a thriving academic hub, complete with modern lecture halls, state-of-the-art laboratories, well-equipped libraries, and recreational facilities embedded in an architectural design that reflects a blend of tradition and modernity, creating an environment that is both inspiring and conducive to learning. These infrastructural developments are a testament to the university’s long-term vision to make learning conducive in a friendly atmosphere.

However, LCU’s journey has not been without challenges. Like all private institutions, it has had to navigate the complexities of Nigeria’s educational sector, including regulatory policies, economic fluctuations, and the evolving expectations of students and parents. For instance, the unpredictability of the country’s economy has often made financial planning difficult for the institution and its students. Yet, through strategic planning and resilience, LCU has continued to evolve, adapting to changes while maintaining its core mission.

The role of technology in education has also become increasingly significant in recent years, and LCU has recognized the need to integrate digital learning into its academic framework. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted educational systems globally and became a wake-up call for institutions to adopt more technologically driven learning methods. LCU strengthened its digital learning infrastructure, enabling students to continue their education remotely. The university’s investment in e-learning platforms, virtual labs, and online course delivery models reflects its readiness to embrace the future of education.

At one point, the university displayed mastery of digital tools to drive enrollment. This was in the wake of low enrollments, especially as very few citizens of Oyo State see the school as a prospect. During this period, the university had a large number of its students coming from outside the state. In response, the dedicated marketing teams deployed various traditional and digital tools, effectively utilizing social media, newsletters, and email marketing to achieve outstanding results. This is but a display of innovative thinking by a core department in the school.

As Lead City University celebrates its 20th anniversary, it is at a critical juncture that demands an even more significant commitment to innovation, research, and global academic engagement. The next phase of its journey will undoubtedly require a stronger emphasis on technological integration, expanded research initiatives, and deeper collaborations with local and international institutions. The university has already laid a strong foundation, but the challenge is to build upon it, ensuring that the next twenty years bring even more outstanding achievements.

Lead City at 20 is not just a celebration of longevity but a testament to the power of vision, perseverance, and growth; from a promising idea to a respected institution, LCU’s story is one of transformation and impact.

Looking ahead, the university must continue to evolve, keeping pace with global academic trends while staying true to its mission. Whether through the expansion of its research capabilities, increased industry collaborations, or the continued development of its students, LCU’s future is filled with possibilities. The past twenty years have been remarkable, but the next two decades hold even more significant potential.

For students, alums, faculty, and stakeholders, Lead City University is more than just an institution—it is a community, a movement, and a legacy in the making. As the university steps into the future, it does so with the same ambition and resolve that fueled its inception. The journey is far from over; in many ways, it is only just beginning.

. Falola is Professor Emeritus in the Humanities Lead City University.

Continue Reading

Top Stories