Opinion
Emeritus Professor Otonti Amadi Nduka And The Socratic Tradition
Published
1 year agoon
By Tunji Olaopa
When a scholar combines a mentoring frame of mind, and educational energy and a philosophical bent of mind, what you have is a Socratic orientation; what you have is Professor Otonti Nduka. I just met Professor Nduka some months ago, and in that short period, I have had moments of epiphanies and humility in equal proportion. When I think of Prof. Nduka, my mind resolutely revisits Woodrow Wilson’s admonition: “You are not here merely to make a living. You are here in order to enable the world to live more amply, with greater vision, with a finer spirit of hope and achievement. You are here to enrich the world, and you impoverish yourself if you forget the errand.” Prof. Nduka embodies this admonition as father, husband, scholar and mentor.
As a nonagenarian, Prof. Nduka at 94, embodies memories and experiences, insights and understanding that constitute the stuffs of great wisdom that a mentor, if he so wishes, must dispense to others. I have inserted the clause of the will to mentor because not many have that will or the opportunity or even the charisma to mentor others. This distinguished nonagenarian is an accomplished scholar. But being a great scholar is not the same as possessing the capacity to impart and impact. When Prof. T. Uzodimma Nwala, the erudite African philosopher, delivered his inaugural lecture in 2007, he brazenly titled it, “The Otonti Nduka Mandate.” Rarely can you see anyone who places so much honor on the mentorial trajectory of his life as to dedicate his inaugural lecture to the name and memory of his mentor. Nwala categorically states that Prof. Nduka singularly set him on the course that brought him to that stage of professorial erudition. From a nebulous ambition to study economics, Prof. Nduka told Nwala: “No. you will not study economics. You are a philosophy material.” And the rest is history.
I suspect that when Papa Nduka made that pronouncement, he had not gazed into any crystal ball or saw a vision, order than the conviction that from his assessment of the intellectual precocity of Nwala, philosophy would serve as a better disciplinary mold. Nwala was able to honor Nduka from the pedestal of his achievement as a professor of philosophy. But then, how many more mentees can we count who do not have the privilege of an inaugural lecture, but who have inscribed Prof. Nduka into their memories and stories. Thus, while still alive, Papa Otonti Nduka has already achieved immortality.
The entire trajectory of Prof. Nduka’s coming of age speaks to what we can call the educare imperative: a lifetime of learning educationally, building educational scholarship and educational institutional and educating others, a dynamic which rekindles the memory of another giant educator, Emeritus Professor Pai Obanya of the University of Ibadan. Educare speaks to humanity’s capacity to rehabilitate itself through a consistent learning curve that opens up one dimension of the human to other dimensions in ways that make a human person open to the possibilities of other human persons. And this is an imperative I could relate with because it resonates with my lifelong understanding and pursuit of a learning philosophy that could assist in alleviating some of the terrible practices that keep dogging the heels of Nigeria’s national integration into one and united nation. I have been too committed to educational reforms, as part of my lifelong advocacy of institutional and governance reforms, not to understand the role that the education sector can contribute to the realignment of minds—between the leadership and the followership—to facilitate a civic collaboration that works for patriotism. The Nigerian polity is divided along the ethnic and religious lines. Ethnic jingoism and religious fundamentalism have become the bane of mutual and reinforcing relations that enable us to put to good use Nigeria’s ethnic and generational capitals. This close-mindedness feeds off and emasculates the capacity first to learn, and then second to learn to live together and build together. While Nigerians have learnt to perceive every matter of national development through the ethnic and religious prisms, we keep failing to note the simple truth that our prejudicial relations will keep deepening the fissures in our national life.
From the disciplined and the synthesizing minds to the respectful and ethical minds, those Howard Gardner refers to as the “minds of the future,” we can begin to nurture together a Nigeria of the future; a Nigeria represented by minds like Prof. Otonti Nduka whose mentoring schedule does not discriminate. And this brings me to another fundamental dimension of Prof. Nduka’s life work: the scholarship that intersects philosophy and education. No wonder his 1986 inaugural lecture bore the title, “In the Socratic Tradition.” Socrates it was whose peripatetic wondering brought to light that axiom for all ages and time: the unexamined life is not worth living. And convinced of the need for wisdom by humanity, he gave himself the critical task of inquiring into the very depth of human knowledge, values and practices. And, as the title of the inaugural lecture suggests, Prof. Nduka gave himself the task of unraveling the Nigerian factor which he fragmented into several subspecies—“the north/ south factor, the ethnicity factor, the religious factor, the population factor, the naira factor, ten percent factor and the barrel of the gun factor”—which have all succeeded in derailing Nigeria’s greatness. And the Socratic imperative, for him, consists of synthesizing, from the traditional and modern values, principles and ideas, those which could be refined, rethought and deployed for transforming the Nigerian society.
Prof. Nduka’s lifelong research framework embeds the values of education and an axiological research dynamic in the imperative of building a better Nigerian society. At its core, the Nigerian predicament is a moral one. It can be traced to a gradual but steady disintegration of the value frames of reference by which state and society are ordered in order to produce human flourishing. Unfortunately, and since the dawn of independence, moral, political and bureaucratic corruption have colluded to undermine the best efforts of transforming the Nigerian state. Corruption in all its forms is a moral conundrum. And that poses a deep challenge to our humanity and our scholarship. It is this challenge that Prof. Nduka takes right on and by both horns. When, in 1964, Prof. Nduka published Western Education and Nigerian Cultural Background, the famous (or notorious) Ashby Commission report had been submitted. And the then young graduate of the philosophy of education saw right through many of the Commission’s ill-thought-out assessments and recommendations.
And as was to be expected, Prof. Nduka’s criticism of the Ashby Report stems from its unfounded value (or, precisely the lack of values) orientation that undergirds a vision of Nigeria. And this seminal identification of the source of the moral morass of the Nigerian society did not only motivate research projects, but also led him to the establishment of the Otonti Nduka Foundation for Values Education as a practical push for disseminating research finding as well as creating awareness around the correlation between the corruption epidemic and the success (or failure) of Nigeria’s democratic experiment. If the core of the Nigerian underdevelopment is the lack of values and norms that condition leadership conduct and performance, as well as an ethical code for public servants and government functionaries, then the starting point is to exhume what is lost and reaffirm their potency in reconditioning the Nigerian state for greatness. This allows Prof. Nduka to rethink the War Against Indiscipline of 1983 as one significant but poorly enacted policy by the Buhari-Idiagbon administration in confronting and undermining Nigeria’s moral decline.
Socrates once affirmed: “It is not living that matters, but living rightly.” It is easy to articulate Prof. Nduka’s moral crusade from this singular quote by his intellectual forebear. Imagine a significant percentage of Nigerians, especially the Nigerian leadership in all its dimensions, living rightly. Imagine budgets are not padded, infrastructures are not compromised due to bribes and kickbacks, politicians and citizens do not collude in degrading the Nigerian dream, the electorate is not compromised and debased because of the pursuit of political power, and so on. And all these were the basis of Socrates’ philosophical ruminations and invitation to the youth of ancient Athens: Know yourself. This is the first injunction that carries the possibility of a moral revolution. This is the ethical injunction that underlies Prof. Nduka’s value crusades, in research and in practice.
And yet, quite unfortunately, Socrates met his end in a judicial murder by the same society he was anxious and assiduous to point in the direction of moral redemption. Prof. Nduka’s inaugural lecture also reveals a lot in terms of the anguish of a moral reformer and the societal neglect of the strident cries of a lone wolf. Just as Nigerian hounds and pushes her heroes to the precipice, so it also confines her moral and institutional crusaders and advocates to the dark night of silence and utter neglect. Prof. Otonti Nduka embodies the vision and shape of what a new Nigeria will feel like. This is where I become a kindred spirit with Baba Nduka. And yet, he is unrelenting. I salute that lifelong and continuing strength of purpose. And I salute his existential courage.
Olaopa is a retired Federal Permanent Secretary, and Professor of Public Administration .
You may like
-
Perspectives On Elon Musk As Reform Lead For US Federal Bureaucracy
-
Jibrin Ibrahim And The Shaping Of Nigeria’s Discursive Space
-
Leadership Ethics Template For Reinventing Akinyele Era Of Civil Service In Nigeria
-
In ‘Katsina Declaration’, Civil Service Commissions Move To Reposition For Better Public Service
-
Olaopa Emerges AAPSCOMS’ Vice President As Nigeria Hosts Body In 2026
-
Can Democracy Work In Nigeria?
By Leo Igwe
The Advocacy for Alleged Witches (AfAW) is concerned over the reported arrest of two men accused of being ‘witchdoctors’ in Zambia. The arrest underscores the potency of witchcraft fears and the connection between occult anxieties and the country’s politics. These individuals were accused of trying to bewitch the Zambian president, Hakainde Hichilema. The police claimed that they had charms. They planned to use the charms to harm the president. The report says the two persons have been charged under Zambia’s Witchcraft Act. The Act criminalizes “possession of charms”, “professing knowledge of witchcraft”, and “cruelty to wild animals”. The police found the two with assorted charms, including a live chameleon.
This development is utterly embarrassing and shows that the Zambian government is slowly losing its focus and bearing.The country has many socio-economic challenges. Suspicion of bewitchment or possession of charms should be the least of its worries at this time. There should be no place for witchcraft and possession of charms in modern politics because there is no evidence for these beliefs and practices. Zambian authorities should not weaponize the Witchcraft Act or use it to justify this incident. Zambian law does not recognize witchcraft. Zambia’s Witchcraft Act criminalizes naming or imputing witchcraft. It prohibits accusing or threatening to accuse any person of being a witch or a wizard. In this case, it is the police who are breaking the law.
Otherwise, how did they know the two individuals were ‘witchdoctors’? Did these persons identify as witch doctors? If not, the police are liable because they named and imputed witchcraft and have to prove that these individuals have witch-doctoring powers. The police claimed to have charged these individuals for possessing “assorted charms”, including a chameleon. Really?
The police in Zambia have questions to answer: What are charms? How did they know that what was in their possession were charms, not pets? Is a chameleon a form of charm? What makes possession of a chameleon possession of a charm? When and how does a chameleon become a charm? The police need to answer these questions and more before one takes them seriously.
Again, did the individuals describe what was in possession as ‘charms’? If they did, does confessing or designating something as a charm make it a charm? And if they did not, the police are liable because they need to prove how those possessions translated into charms.
In addition, the police claimed that the duo wanted to bewitch the president. What does that mean? How did they know? Are the police not contravening a provision under the Witchcraft Act by professing knowledge of witchcraft? Can one harm another person using a chameleon? They claimed that the two persons wanted to use the charms in their possession, including the chameleon to harm the president. How did they know that? What is the evidence for that?
The Advocacy for Alleged Witches calls for an end to this state-sponsored witch hunt. There is no evidence of harm through witchcraft or charms. The Zambian government should desist from witchcraft- related infractions and violations including arbitrary arrest, and detention of innocent citizens. These allegations are baseless and absurd. The arrest was politically motivated. This development demonstrates that Zambian authorities are out of sync with their duty and obligation to uphold the rule of law and protect accused persons.
Zambian authorities need to act in compliance with the 2021 UN resolution, which urged states to take measures to combat abuses linked to witchcraft beliefs and ritual attacks. End witchcraft allegations in Zambia. End witch hunts in Africa now!
Dr Igwe directs the Advocacy for Alleged Witches.
By Tony Afejuku
The other burning issue, apart from Farotimi and Babalola’s, which I wish to take a look at – and which I am taking a look at now – relates to what is happening in our capital territory. What is this burning issue – which our human rightists and civil society organisations and personages are surprisingly and un-satisfactorily not inclined to focus attention on and examine as they should? I may be wrong, but it surely seems to me that this issue, this burning issue, which is of more importance than Farotimi and Babalola’s – which has been given undue adulation – is deliberately being neglected and depreciated by proclaimers and heroes and heroines of human rights, justice, equity and equality of rights in your country my country our country. Why, why, why and why, why, why? Anyone who has any iota of patriotic sensibility, feeling and judgment well watered and buttressed by a very great influence upon his or her critical judgment will keep on asking the question I am asking.
Mr. Nyesom Wike, as almost everybody who can read and write a little knows, is the current minister of your, my and our Federal Capital Territory. His post or office is akin to that of a governor of a state. As the immediate past governor of Rivers State who was drafted, after his two terms there expired, to continue in the FCT as its new minister-governor or governor-minister under the auspices of a party he is not a true member of, Mr. Wike cannot but be seen as a lucky man. He is in every possible and impossible way. Minister-Governor Wike is a lucky man and a very fortunate one indeed. No former governor of Rivers State (or of any Nigerian state), as far as I know, has achieved what the famed political rouser of rabbles has achieved in one short gubernatorial life-time, and at a relatively young and fertile age. His dual achievement with and in two different political parties at this delicate point of Nigerian politics indicates to our politicians and us all that there is always time for a reminder that there are ready-made high rewards for arch-angels of betrayals. And Mr. Wike may go down in Rivers and Nigerian history as both an arch-angel and an emperor of betrayal of us all if we attempt to indicate what I have defined here as his dual achievement.
We can roughly divide, briefly, Wike’s political development into two periods. During the first, excluding his lower political positions before he became the governor of Rivers State, he quickly adapted his style to that of an emperor who became a rabble-rouser of rabble-rousers whose gubernatorial efficiency moved from stiffness to stiffness. He did not at any time feel that he needed suppleness to govern Rivers State. “Let the heavens fall if they must fall!” We are not there yet in this attempted analysis of the stiff-hearted and stiff-minded one. True? But he is already demonstrating this characteristic in Abuja. False? Judge and give the answer yourself.
Even after he left Rivers State a short while ago as governor, he is still trying to control happenings there to the political discomfiture of his hand-picked successor, his erstwhile “boy” and “son” – with whom he has fallen out. As the minister-governor or governor-minister of the FCT, Wike is occupied with the other taste of the emperor-juggernaut formulator – doing the work of two key political masters in one room and desk of political jugglery. Since his appearance in the FCT, minister-governor or governor-minister Wike has allegedly attempted to recover or transform for Abuja what is not traditionally or socially Abuja’s, for example, the city’s social idiom and landscape and terrain as well as its environs. In doing this he sometimes over-steps his bounds and mark of human/inhuman decency/indecency and psychological understanding of human nature, if you follow well what I am saying; he has so far become at best not really better than a typical pedestrian Nigerian lawyer and officer of political power: in his explorations so far in the Federal Capital Territory we have come to the realization, as T. S. Eliot would say, that “it is so often true that only by going too far can we find out how far we can go.” But one has to be a very negatively obstinate and self-serving emperor and a thorough-bred arch-angel of betrayal of the people and masses to justify such perilous and perfidious expeditions and adventures.
Last week, I saw on Arise Television “The Morning Show” Chief Rita Lori-Ogbebor, the dutiful widow of the late Nigerian supreme patriot and soldier, Colonel Ogbebor (of Benin stock) battling, so to say, to wrest the legacy of her late husband from the tight grip of the adventurous FCT minister-governor who has registered his name and signature in the hearts and consciousness of the people as the depriver of their possessions. The three anchors of “The Morning Show” were in their respective ways splendid in their structures of remarks and questions to Chief (Mrs.) Rita Lori-Ogbebor whom I have had occasions in times past to call patriotically Rita A-K 47 on account of her natural right to fire her beautiful tongue at any person, usually an enemy, of just actions. When she made the case she made to protect the estate of Paulosa Nigeria Limited, her late husband’s aforesaid legacy in the FCT, she was in her natural territory, habitat and element where even at age eighty-four, she never ever loses her stability – although she unusually restrained herself in the Arise Television appearance. Dr. Reuben Abati, Rufai Oseni, and Ayo Mairo-Ese clearly explored seriously but delightfully the mind of the mother-hen of Warri – my other coinage and appellation I gave her in my poetry. Her “The Morning Show” appearance enabled me to see the poignant cry de profundis of the FCT inhabitants whose property and residences in different guises have been demolished. She did not say anything that was out of joint. She spoke and came out as a mother, protector and symbol of the people who have suffered – and are suffering – from the state of affliction and anguish Wike’s demolitions have placed – and are placing – the people.
Ojy Okpe in her delicious and delectable “What is Trending” slot on the same show, showed without exaggeration but with further elaboration what people in and outside Abuja/FCT think of the mighty Wike’s demolitions, a burning issue that the Senate has asked “Let Heaven Fall” minister-governor Wike to halt as the committee the Senate set up on the issue starts its work. Of course, we cannot but assume that Chief Rita Lori-Ogbebor, Mrs. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan as well as Mrs. Ireti Kingigbe, the senator representing the FCT in the Senate and other patriotic senators diligently did what they did on the floor of the Senate when the burning issue was tabled for debate with the gracious understanding and authorization of the Senate President.
I need to state further that the “The Morning Show” anchors did well and extremely so by giving the minister-governor the opportunity to air his anti-Paulosa story. His senior special assistant on public communication and social media, Mr. Olalere Olayinka, stood in for him. After he gave the reasons for the clamp-down, his responses to the questions the anchors put to him followed the usual pattern of denials by artificial men in power – denials that they always use to intimidate and betray the people. In fact, Mr. Olayinka’s ploy to ride easily over our dear Rufai Oseni, a wholesome representative of the deprived, that the chap (or is it guy?) and his boss always employ their colloquial speeches and remarks to dishonor, failed. Yes, the ploy failed woefully. In stanza after stanza of the exchanges between Mr. Olayinka and the Arise anchors, he deteriorated – and his deterioration was hall-marked when he unwittingly revealed that the Paulosa land had been acquired by his minister-governor’s close cohort, an act that was nothing short of gross abuse of power and authority.
Because the Senate is already using its authority, power and privilege to resolve the burning issue, hopefully, in a way that the late Colonel Ogbebor’s legacy and family will not be subjected to any kind of degradation, I will utter no more words for now. I trust, however, that the liberties the Senate is taking – or has taken – are for the sake of order to favour the down-trodden.
As for the minister-governor, the PDP emperor at large, here is an immortal quote from Marcus Aurelius, the magnificent and authentic Roman Emperor and philosopher (A.D. 121-180): “If it is not right, do not do it; if it is not true, do not say it.” You lose nothing by giving us a slice of your humanity by your right acts and correct words. Everything changes and passes. Be humane as a human being.
Afejuku can be reached via 08055213059.
By Leo Igwe
Recently, I facilitated a critical thinking workshop at the Bay Wreath Schools in Lagos. The theme was critical thinking and teacher development. As the theme stated, the workshop was on teaching, about teaching, and for teachers. It highlighted the pedagogical value of critical and reflective inquiry. The workshop exposed teachers to critical mental habits and skills. It emphasized how critical thinking would enhance expertise in the learning and delivery of subjects in classrooms.
I used the opportunity to discuss questionstorm as a method of teaching and learning. Questionstorm is a way that I operationalized critical thinking for primary and elementary schools. Questionstorm is the ability to interrogate all objects and materials. It is a habit of questioning ideas and experiences in all areas of human endeavor. Simply put, questionstorm is a question-driven inquiry. Children are naturally curious. They thirst for knowledge and understanding. Unfortunately, the school system kills children’s curiosity and dampens their interrogative appetite. The school system places much emphasis on rote learning and memorization. It makes the generation of answers not questions or problems the test of knowledge, and the determinant of intelligence. Teaching is largely a drudgery, a monotonous exercise, and a process of depositing knowledge on passive recipients, the students. Teaching entails dumping information on learners whose duty is to cram and reproduce during tests or examinations.
This teaching praxis has been criticized and blamed for the poor performance of students post-school (college and university) and their inability to think independently, creatively, and innovatively. Other teaching methods have tried to address these gaps and limitations. There have been suggestions to make teaching and instruction more active, and more student/learner/child-centered. One such method is the Montessori method. The Montessori method discourages grades and tests as ways of measuring achievement or determining intelligence and excellence. It emphasizes hands-on learning and the development of real-world skills. While the Montessori method stresses the practical approach to learning it says very little about the authoritarian teacher-to-student approach that is the mainstay of teaching and learning in classrooms. Teaching follows a pattern that leaves students and learners in the margins and unable to question and contribute to the learning process. Teachers present what is to be learned such as a text, and then generate questions that students respond or address to demonstrate knowledge of what has been taught. The student’s or learner’s main job is to answer questions, to look for or find answers or solutions. The teacher’s work is to get students to look for, and provide answers, and reproduce what they have been taught or told. But students are answer-depots. Students are not memory banks or reserves. They are active minds and thinking agents.
With questionstorm as a teaching method, the mode of instruction would change. Teaching becomes a cooperative endeavor that actively involves teachers and students. What is taught in the classroom is a collaborative note, not the teacher’s note, not a handout to students. Teachers present or generate texts or objects for learning, in response to intense questioning of the object or material by students, teachers provide information as required for that subject, topic, level, and time frame. No two instances of teaching – of the same topic or subject- are or should be the same because the input of students and teachers is not predetermined.
This is because of an overlooked principle in teaching and learning, that I call the “uncertainty principle”.
The uncertainty principle underlies questionstorm because knowledge is not fixed. Learning is a fluid process. All that is to be learned is uncertain, it is unknown and never determined. No teacher can say beforehand what is to be taught or learned because no one knows exactly the questions and answers or replies that would arise when a topic is presented or taught in a particular class. A topic or learning material elicits unique responses and exchanges that both teachers and students cannot exactly know or predict a priori, before the fact.
Teaching is a shared task and responsibility. Class notes are fluid materials. They are not texts cast on educational stones and delivered by teachers to students to copy, cut, and paste as is often the case. Class notes are not written or produced by teachers for students but by teachers with students. Teachers’ notes are incomplete and insufficient. They account only for a part, not a whole of the learning process and material. Students’ input completes and complements the teaching material and learning process. Thus every class note is unique because it is a product of a specific collaborative endeavor, a product of particular teaching and learning agents and circumstances that cannot be repeated or replicated.
Thus, as a teaching method, questionstorm is set to facilitate teacher development and improve the quality of instruction in schools. Questionstorm will help realize a paradigm shift in education and learning. I hope educators, teachers, and school managers will embrace this method of teaching and learning.
Dr Igwe directs the Critical Thinking Social Empowerment Foundation.
Inline image
NEW TIMES CULTURE
Fear Of Witchcraft And Politics In Zambia
Black Saturday As 10 Confirmed Dead, Others Injured In Abuja Church Stampede
Tinubu Congratulates Civil Service Commission Chair Olaopa As He Turns 65
Top Stories
-
Latest News19 hours ago
Black Saturday As 10 Confirmed Dead, Others Injured In Abuja Church Stampede
-
Opinion3 days ago
Burning Issues: (FCT Minister And Paulosa) (2)
-
Opinion17 hours ago
Fear Of Witchcraft And Politics In Zambia
-
Latest News5 days ago
Why We Set Up Kojola Dry Port – Abiodun
-
Metro3 days ago
AfAW Decries Court Acquittal Of Suspected Murderer Of Alleged Witch In Enugu