Opinion
Letter To Nnamdi Azikiwe
Published
2 years agoon

By Omoh Giwa
Messiah Or Not?
Dear Zik,
Our people say one whose house is on fire does not hunt rats hence the exigency to document my thoughts will prohibit the usual pomp and pageantry accorded a man of your calibre. It will also prevent me from enquiring about your current residence and welfare. I would have addressed the elephant in the room: if you regret your unholy alliance with the North? How could you have banded with those turban-wearing feudalists against the jolly, nonchalant Yorubas? I understand that you might have felt slighted with your ousting in the Western elections in 1951 but that is no excuse for choosing the North over a southerner (the strategy you and Awo employed is still being used to tear this nation apart by the seams but I am not here for you) but I won’t.
One would think Nigerians would honour your legacy but what is honour amongst those who champion the cause of thieves, embezzlers, nepotistic selfish old men? I should be commending you for throwing support for Samuel Akinsanya against Ernest Ikoli, a fellow Easterner for a seat at the Legislative Council as representatives of the Nigerian Youth Movement in 1941 but he lost and I wonder if it was a ploy considering the role you played in discrediting the Eyo Ita led-administration. I would have called you a true nationalist but what do I know about the motives of politicians?
That is water under the bridge as I have not awoken you to antagonise you. Are you aware your kinsman, Okwute is in the running to become president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria? This is the first time since the fourth republic began that an Igbo man has been this close to that seat. His intention, he claims, is to save Nigeria and her people from ruin wrought on by corruption, embezzlement, nepotism, dastardly economic policies.
You might find the aspersions cast on his person and record as two-time serving governor of your state (even the current governor who lost to Obi in 2009 disputes Okwute’s claims of frugality and economic growth as if we do not know that he is bitter about his loss many years ago) ridiculous but it is not surprising. The kind of campaigning and politics we practice is blackmailing, name-smearing and racketeering. I, however, am confused at the scrutiny he has had to bear because he dared to exercise his fundamental obligation of voting and being voted for as a citizen of his country. They combed through his business and personal dealings and that of his children (imagine if he was like the other contender who is infamous for his affair with that petite actress). Do you know one of the candidates was exposed as a Nigerian Pablo Escobar but apparently, we do not care about such trivialities despite the epidemic of drug abuse among Nigerian students and youth.
This has led me to ponder two things: did you go through such scrutiny before you emerged ceremonial president or did this suspicion of anything Igbo begin after your defeat in 1970? If you were still an occupant of this dimension, would you have endorsed him or would you take the approach you did during the civil war?
Even if he loses, Okwute’s involvement in presidential elections seem to have changed the tide (hopefully permanently). Gone are the days politicians ate corn by the roadside, helped hair stylists braid hair, pumped tyres at the closest junction and stole primary school students poorly-coloured rice. His influence though, was not strong enough to drag them by their babarigas to the debate podiums (I would refuse to contest wit and brain with an Harvard graduate too especially if there is contention over my degree) .
Owelle, you would be proud of the eloquence and dexterity in which Okwute speaks, how he analyses the trouble with Nigeria and his plans on tackling said problems (unlike those who said there should be mass recruitment of 50 million unemployed youths into the army). Do not even bother about the aspirant that has been aspiring since ‘93 and keeps swinging from pillar to post like those distant relatives of our species in search for bananas or the one that had to subtly threaten his godson (or is he godfather?) before party primaries. Sadly, the Nigerian electorate are not convinced by eloquence, decent behaviour or history (if they were how do you account for the error of 2015 and 2019). We are swayed by deep pockets and even wider benevolent palms that are stretched to us once every four years which your kinsman has promised not to engage in (I will not mention the supposed two billion to the Christian association).
The confidence with which he commands us to ‘go and verify’ when he speaks of his time as governor and the testimonies of past school prefects who speak of his attention to education is a plus for his campaign. His diligence in clearing the filth and curbing crime especially at the infamous Onitsha market is also worthy of praise.
However, two issues keep me up at night; divisive politics and messiah complex. I would have addressed my fear of divisive politics to the originator, your compatriot but he refused to acknowledge my previous missive to him and I have decided to ignore him too. Every election cycle, politicians use the same tactics in garnering votes (Us against them, Yoruba against Igbos, South VS North when in actuality the only difference is the powerful against the powerless. You should have witnessed the marriage of a rich entrepreneur’s daughter and these ethnic/religious/political loyalties meant nothing as they wined, dined and partied like it was the end of the world). Yet, mere foot soldiers send threats and promises to decimate each other as we have seen a traditional ruler promise to cast Igbos into the lagoon if his affiliated party lost. More recently a lower chief promised an exodus of foreigners and the loss of their lives or livelihood if his party loses the election. At what point do we take these threats seriously?
Seun Kuti, a musician called your man an opportunist because he did not build his own structure and was supposedly resting on the laurels of the Labour party while Peter Okoye, another musician responded derogatorily. Others began to pick sides while playing the ethnic card as though ethnic difference was the bone of contention. Non-Igbo supporters often have to state their ethnicity in a bid to prove that his following was not determined by ethnicity but ideology. I do not see anyone questioning Atiku/Tinubu’s supporters yet many have insisted that only Igbos would support him.
Despite the beauty of your kinsman’s message of hope and better days, I am uncomfortable with the messiah status he has been attributed by his adherents. Nigerians seem to favour the messiah narrative (like they did with a certain military dictator whom they clothed in the stolen robes of an angelic saviour) as we have attributed to Obi. They touted our present error’s obstinate and insensitivity methods as the solution to our problems since independence. They said the Nation needed a firm hand as though we were delinquents in need of tough love. They sold the hardship of the 80s as our glory days that needed reawakening. Like goats, we have continued on that track again. As beautiful as Peter Obi’s curriculum vitae might seem, he is not a saviour. Only the people of Nigeria can save themselves from this quagmire. We need a leader (yes) but the people of Nigeria should be the change they desire. How can we ask one man to bear the burden of transformation when we make questionable choices (look at our reactions to economic issues and desire to exploit the other). Obi might be exceptional especially as he seems to be a cat with nine lives but he is a man and should not shoulder the sole responsibility of positive change.
I hope we get it right this time.
Politically yours,
Giwa.
You may like
-
BREAKING: Tinubu Appoints Ogunjimi As Accountant General Of Federation
-
The BAT Presidential Media Chat
-
Tinubu Congratulates Civil Service Commission Chair Olaopa As He Turns 65
-
A Conversation About Hunger
-
Tinubu, Abiodun, Sanwo-Olu, Others Celebrate Bakare At 70
-
Uncertainty As Tinubu Appoints Maj-Gen Olufemi Acting Chief Of Army Staff
Opinion
Stellenbosch: Senzeni Na And Decolonizing Secularity In Africa
Published
3 hours agoon
March 11, 2025
By Leo Igwe
In December, I attended a workshop on Decolonizing Secularity in Africa. It was one of my best conferences because it highlighted issues that have worried me over the years. For the first time, I attended an academic conference on religion or secularism in Africa that featured a panel on atheism and humanism in Africa. Organized by Point Sud, this workshop was held at Stellenbosch in South Africa. Interestingly I did not know about Stellenbosch’s colonial history and significance. So I could say with the benefit of hindsight that the choice of Stellenbosch as a venue for this event was adequate. The goal of the workshop was, based on the coloniality of secularity, to interrogate the “liberating force of religion, the secular in ethnic nationalisms, and the ideologies of culturalization, not least in its current revenant, heritagization, in Africa and beyond”. It was great to meet, discuss, and exchange ideas on colonization, decolonization, religion, and secularity with scholars and activists from different parts of the continent and the world. Many issues that emerged at the conference have continued to agitate my mind. First is the so much emphasis on colonization. I have continued to wonder: Can’t we meaningfully discuss African issues without alluding to colonialism? Again, reference is always made to Western colonialism. What about Eastern and other forms? Many parts of America were colonized at one point or the other. Weren’t they? The same with Europe, Asia, and Oceania. But it is only in the case of Africa that there is an overemphasis on Western colonialism. Incidentally, many African scholars have unwittingly joined in explaining Africa through the lens of colonialism, western colonialism.
The fixation on colonialism is not without a reason. I attended an African studies conference some years ago and someone alluded to a comment by a Western scholar, that regarding Africa, before colonialism, there was nothing. There was nothing? I was shocked to hear that comment. Look, that I do not know or nobody knows about a period in history, does not mean that there was nothing. Is it not better to say I do not know than to make such a dimwitted statement? What applies to Africa, applies to other places in the world. There are stages in their histories nobody knows what happened. Or what is known is patchy. That should not be a reason to say that there was nothing.
One issue that engaged attendees was the meaning of ‘decolonizing’. What does it mean to decolonize? Some define decolonization as removing or undoing colonial elements and influences. And if that is the case, what do we remove or undo? And who does that and Why? how do we undo the Western colonial linguistic influence? What about the eastern and other colonial elements? Is it possible or feasible to remove or undo all colonial influences? By the way, is religion or secularity as introduced to Africa decolonized?
Some participants argued that decolonizing secularity implied going back in time before colonialism. So, how far can we go and why? In the process won’t we go back to that time “when there was nothing?” Can’t we decolonize without returning to the past? Can’t we decolonize looking forward and not backward? Is religion or secularity not an embodiment of layers of influences over the years? If we were to peel off these ‘colonial’ elements, what would be left? Some propose a return to the indigenous forms of secularity or religion as the case may be. The question is this: What does indigenous mean? Who defines or determines it? Is the indigenous the same for all? What is considered indigenous to South Africans may not be to Kenyans, Nigerians, or Malians. What is considered indigenous in a part of Nigeria may be a legacy of the colonial influence by another part of Nigeria. So what is indigenous to Africa is not monolithic and regionally applicable.
That leads me to another controversial issue that came up at the workshop, which is, one secularity or multiple secularities. Some of the participants especially those from the Department of Religion, at the University of Cape Town were of the view that there was one secularity, that is the western secularity is manifesting in other climes, in different forms. While other participants from Europe leaned towards the notion of multiple secularities highlighting forms of distinction and differentiation between religion and other social domains across cultures. Although secularism or secularity is Western in origin, what the concept represents manifests in other cultures and societies. Secularities predate Western secularity or manifest and feature in ways that do not fit into or align with Western secularity.
As I noted earlier, there have been colonialisms before Western colonialism. There have been secularities before Western secularity. Although Western colonialism brought the influence of western religion and secularity to bear on various cultures and societies, the colonial encounter does not negate the social differentiation of religion and other domains in these societies. It is only in seeing or articulating secularity in its multiple forms that these situations, dynamics, and intersections could adequately be captured. So, the concept of multiple secularities has enormous explanatory power. It is useful and helpful in highlighting the social distinction of religion and other domains in cultures and societies beyond the West.
For instance, western missionaries introduced christianity and the Christian god to Africa. What we have is one Christianity or Islam manifesting in different forms. Africans have adapted and reinvented the Christian religion over the years, hence the notion of African Christianities. Again while western Christian missionaries introduced Christian religion or religiosity, they did not introduce religion. religiosity, or the idea of god. There are other religiosities apart from and beyond Christianities/Christian religiosities. There are other gods and deities beyond the Christian god/deity. I think the idea of multiple secularities or multiple religiosities has much more descriptive value.
Another issue that came up at the event, not surprisingly so, was apartheid. One of the presenters analyzed the song, Senzeni Na (What have we done?) to buttress his point. I have never heard of the song. I didn’t know its relevance to the anti-apartheid struggle. In the course of the discussions, it was noted how other Africans including Nigerians are not conscious or sensitive to the pains of apartheid. I noticed from the expressions of some South Africans at the meeting that they were not happy with the nonchalant attitudes of Nigerians towards their experience. I believe that black South Africans are right to feel that way. The apartheid was a tragic experience that still hurts blacks in contemporary South Africa. The painful memories won’t quickly go away. Black South Africans should also understand that Nigerians have a different history and experience. They should also not forget that the Nigerian and other African governments contributed a lot to the anti-apartheid struggle. Nigeria supported Nelson Mandela and other heroes and heroines of the struggle.
Many South Africans do not relate to the tragedy of the Rwandan genocide as Rwandans do. They do not relate to the pain and trauma of the Nigerian civil war. In meetings and conferences, they treat these experiences and encounters lightly because these experiences were not a part of their history. As I noted during my conversations with some of the attendees, while I appreciate the pain and trauma of apartheid, Black South Africans must learn to move on because as they say in the Igbo language, Nke chi ka, meaning, the one yet to come, the future one, the one that belongs to tomorrow, is greater. The greatness of South Africa does not lie in the past but in its tomorrow, in its future. It does not mean that we should not refer or draw from the past. We should and we must. But South Africa is not returning to those days when Senzeni Na was sung. The country is forging ahead and moving towards a better and more glorious future.
This song provides a thrust for this forward and onward movement. It highlights the challenges that South Africans face and are facing. But more importantly, this song codifies the pain and suffering of all humans because all oppressed people everywhere; all who suffer persecution within and without South Africa are singing, Senzeni Na.
Igwe, PhD, was a co-convener of Decolonizing Secularity in Africa, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 9–13 December 2024.
Opinion
Commonwealth Day 2025: Together We Can End Witch Hunts And Ritual Attacks
Published
3 hours agoon
March 11, 2025
By Leo Igwe
As we mark Commonwealth Day 2025, the Advocacy for Alleged Witches protests witch hunts and ritual attacks in Commonwealth countries, and the refusal of the Commonwealth to speak out against these abuses. In many parts of Africa, Asia and Oceania witch hunting is not a thing of the past but an ongoing wave of abuses and violations. In Commonwealth countries such as Ghana, Nigeria, Kenya, Papua New Guinea, persecution of alleged witches rages with force and ferocity. In Ghana, witch persecution results in the displacement of accused persons who then flee to some make shift shelters known as “witch camps”. Those who could not flee to these places like Akua Denteh are murdered in cold blood.
Witchcraft accusation is a form of death sentence for the accused and accused people are sometimes extrajudicially killed despite existing legislations in these countries. Witch trials take place in many countries of the Commonwealth. Trial by ordeal and jungle justice are meted out to the accused. Some weeks ago, an elderly woman who had dementia was accused of witchcraft and beaten to death in Nigeria. In Malawi, alleged witches are stoned to death. In Zambia some political opponents suspected of trying to kill the president using ‘witchcraft’ are standing trial at the state court. Alleged witches, mainly women, children and people with disabilities are attacked, banished, lynched, buried alive or tortured to confess to the ‘crime of witchcraft’.
Witch hunting persists because many countries and groups of countries like the Commonwealth have refused to speak out against these atrocities. The Commonwealth should break its silence on witch hunts and ritual attacks in member countries. It should join the UN in condemning these horrific abuses. The Commonwealth should add its voice to this campaign. It should highlight witch persecution and witch hunting during its meetings and summits. It should call for an end to abuses linked to witchcraft beliefs and ritual attacks. The Commonwealth Day should be an opportunity to recommit to ending this menace. It provides a platform to rally all countries against these violations. No nation should be left behind in the quest to make witch hunting history around the globe.
Together we can end witch hunts and ritual attacks in Commonwealth countries.
Igwe, PhD, directs the Advocacy for Alleged Witches.

By Toyin Falola
Our university is now an adult at 20!
About twenty-two years ago, the vision to redefine the frontiers of private education in Nigeria led to the conceptualization of the idea, which birthed a new direction for education. The thoughts and projections of like-minded educators and academic experts led to the establishment of Lead City University (LCU) as a beacon for progressive education in Nigeria. This development came when access to higher education was limited by rigid institutional structures and to federal, state, and a handful of private institutions.
At inception, LCU was envisioned as an academic environment that was expected to balance flexibility with skills and academic excellence. On this note, the university became fully operational in 2005, having scaled through necessary procedures for establishment. Since then, the university has positioned itself as an institution willing to break conventional norms by offering programs that blend theoretical learning with practical application. The goal was clear—to bridge the gap between academia and the real-world demands of the job market, ensuring that students graduated with certificates, competence, and confidence. Hence the word “enterprise graduate”.
Two decades later, Lead City University has become a household name in private tertiary education in Nigeria and earned the trust of parents, guardians, students, and the education community. From its humble beginnings with two campuses around Jericho and Challenge areas of Ibadan, the University has metamorphosed to its current state, reflecting the institution’s journey of ambition, resilience, and a commitment to continuous improvement. To reiterate, the university’s distinct blue, white, and pink colors symbolize the institution’s values for knowledge, human development, creativity and prestige, and excellence. At the same time, the university’s emblem, which depicts a fusion of knowledge, self-reliance, and technological orientation, is not just a design but a representation of LCU’s enduring promise to its students in equipping them with the tools they need to navigate life’s complexities.
In its formative years, Lead City University set itself apart by adopting an academic model that was both innovative and inclusive. Unlike conventional universities that adhered to a one-size-fits-all approach, LCU introduced learning structures that accommodated working professionals, non-traditional students, and young scholars eager for a more practical learning experience. This unique flexibility over time has attracted a diverse student population, making the university a melting pot of ideas and aspirations.
Significantly, and with every sense of humility, it is worth mentioning that the academic offerings at LCU have grown in milestones over the years. What started as a modest selection of undergraduate programs across the two campuses has expanded into a comprehensive curriculum spanning disciplines such as Business Administration, Law, Engineering, Social Sciences, Computer Science, and Mass Communication. More recently, the university reached a significant milestone with the approval and accreditation of its Medical and Health Science programs, including Medicine and Surgery, Pharmacy, and Physiotherapy.
These additions have broadened the school’s academic reach and cemented its credibility as a serious player in Nigeria’s higher education landscape. This has brought much credence to the school, its parent body, and every stakeholder within its system. This is because achieving accreditation for these highly sought-after courses required a high-level strategic investment in infrastructure, faculty recruitment, and curriculum development. The intensity of these has further proven LCU’s unwavering commitment to quality education.
Beyond the classroom, LCU has been at the forefront of promoting an education system that extends beyond academic achievements. It is an apparent recognition that learning should not be confined to lectures and textbooks. To achieve this, the university has integrated entrepreneurship programs, skill acquisition initiatives, and industrial partnerships into its curriculum as a proactive measure for students to withstand today’s competitive job market, where traditional employment opportunities are increasingly fizzling out. It is a welcome development for a 21st-century school, as graduates need more than theoretical knowledge. They need adaptability, innovation, and more practical experience to fit in. It gladdens the heart to know that LCU understands this reality and has taken deliberate steps to ensure its students are equipped with these critical skills.
A defining aspect of the university’s impact over the past two decades has been its emphasis on accessibility. The tradition before was that private universities in Nigeria were often perceived as elitist due to their tuition costs and the social class that enrolled. At one point, there were similar issues with enrollment, as many were not convinced that it was a school their wards could attend.
To mitigate this, LCU has consistently worked to change the narratives by providing scholarships and financial aid to deserving indigent students. These scholarships, awarded based on merit and financial need, remind the institution of its commitment to inclusivity. These opportunities have been life-changing for many students who might have otherwise been unable to afford higher education. By ensuring that education remains within reach for those who need it most, LCU has once again demonstrated its commitment to shaping futures.
Looking at the trajectory and quality of academic delivery obtained in the school, one cannot salute the decision to have a well-grounded faculty. Faculty development has been another cornerstone of LCU’s success. After all, an institution is only as strong as the quality of its educators. Hence, there is a deliberate commitment to recruiting experienced lecturers, researchers, and industry professionals for its academic team. Over the years, the university has built a faculty that blends theoretical expertise with real-world experience. This approach ensures that students are not just taught from textbooks but are mentored by individuals who have made significant contributions in their respective fields. By fostering an environment of mentorship and academic research, the university has maintained high teaching standards, preparing students for professional and educational pursuits.
The physical transformation of Lead City University over the past twenty years is also worth noting. The university, which began with a modest campus, has since expanded into a thriving academic hub, complete with modern lecture halls, state-of-the-art laboratories, well-equipped libraries, and recreational facilities embedded in an architectural design that reflects a blend of tradition and modernity, creating an environment that is both inspiring and conducive to learning. These infrastructural developments are a testament to the university’s long-term vision to make learning conducive in a friendly atmosphere.
However, LCU’s journey has not been without challenges. Like all private institutions, it has had to navigate the complexities of Nigeria’s educational sector, including regulatory policies, economic fluctuations, and the evolving expectations of students and parents. For instance, the unpredictability of the country’s economy has often made financial planning difficult for the institution and its students. Yet, through strategic planning and resilience, LCU has continued to evolve, adapting to changes while maintaining its core mission.
The role of technology in education has also become increasingly significant in recent years, and LCU has recognized the need to integrate digital learning into its academic framework. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted educational systems globally and became a wake-up call for institutions to adopt more technologically driven learning methods. LCU strengthened its digital learning infrastructure, enabling students to continue their education remotely. The university’s investment in e-learning platforms, virtual labs, and online course delivery models reflects its readiness to embrace the future of education.
At one point, the university displayed mastery of digital tools to drive enrollment. This was in the wake of low enrollments, especially as very few citizens of Oyo State see the school as a prospect. During this period, the university had a large number of its students coming from outside the state. In response, the dedicated marketing teams deployed various traditional and digital tools, effectively utilizing social media, newsletters, and email marketing to achieve outstanding results. This is but a display of innovative thinking by a core department in the school.
As Lead City University celebrates its 20th anniversary, it is at a critical juncture that demands an even more significant commitment to innovation, research, and global academic engagement. The next phase of its journey will undoubtedly require a stronger emphasis on technological integration, expanded research initiatives, and deeper collaborations with local and international institutions. The university has already laid a strong foundation, but the challenge is to build upon it, ensuring that the next twenty years bring even more outstanding achievements.
Lead City at 20 is not just a celebration of longevity but a testament to the power of vision, perseverance, and growth; from a promising idea to a respected institution, LCU’s story is one of transformation and impact.
Looking ahead, the university must continue to evolve, keeping pace with global academic trends while staying true to its mission. Whether through the expansion of its research capabilities, increased industry collaborations, or the continued development of its students, LCU’s future is filled with possibilities. The past twenty years have been remarkable, but the next two decades hold even more significant potential.
For students, alums, faculty, and stakeholders, Lead City University is more than just an institution—it is a community, a movement, and a legacy in the making. As the university steps into the future, it does so with the same ambition and resolve that fueled its inception. The journey is far from over; in many ways, it is only just beginning.
. Falola is Professor Emeritus in the Humanities Lead City University.
NEW TIMES CULTURE

Stellenbosch: Senzeni Na And Decolonizing Secularity In Africa

Commonwealth Day 2025: Together We Can End Witch Hunts And Ritual Attacks

Lead City @20: The Past And The Present
Top Stories
-
Opinion5 days ago
Natasha As Worthy Rebel
-
Latest News4 days ago
BREAKING: Ex-presidential Spokesperson Okupe Dies
-
Opinion4 days ago
Professor Femi Badejo At 70: The Advocacy Of Equity
-
Latest News8 hours ago
Falola To Deliver Memorial Lecture In Honour Of Olukotun
-
Latest News5 hours ago
Falola To Inaugurate Annual Founders’ Lecture At Atiba University, Oyo