Opinion
Witchcraft Accusations And Critical Thinking: Combating Harmful Effects Of Dogma And Superstitions In Africa
Published
2 months agoon
By Leo Igwe
Last year, a friend who manages a school in Lagos invited me to organize a critical thinking workshop for her students. While discussing the program, she noted, “Leo, please do not come here to tell my students that witches do not exist, I beg you”. This lady stated this using a tone that was both a plea and a warning. She warned me because telling her students that witches did not exist could negatively impact her school business. Parents would be displeased and that could make them withdraw their children from the school. This lady wanted me to come to the school and encourage her students to think critically but not regarding witches and witchcraft. Imagine that! Many school owners and board members that I know hold the same view. Many teachers and school heads would push back on efforts to foster critical thinking because they would not want their students to go home to their parents questioning the existence of witches, gods, spirits, demons, and other supernatural entities. Now, what is the essence of education, in this case fostering critical thinking if students cannot question or interrogate ideas, all ideas?
I have been campaigning against abuses linked to witchcraft beliefs and ritual attacks since the 90s. In 2020, I started the Advocacy for Alleged Witches (AfAW). The AfAW responses to persecutions of alleged witches. As its name states, it advocates for the accused, victims of abuses linked to witchcraft beliefs. It works and campaigns to save, protect, defend, and empower the victims. The AfAW amplifies the voices of alleged witches and gets them to tackle their accusers and challenge their persecutors. In addition, the AfAW examines and challenges beliefs, narratives, and assumptions that motivate people to accuse and abuse others in the name of witchcraft, demonic possession, and other supposed occult or evil forces.
Like most Africans, I was brought up in a community where the belief in witches, ancestors, spirits, gods, and other supernatural entities is strong and pervasive. I repeat, belief in witches, ancestors, spirits, gods, and mermaids because these imaginaries are cognate entities. Because these entities go together. One cannot pick and choose what to believe not to believe. To believe in one implies believing in others. And not believing in one implies disbelieving others. When I tell people I do not believe in the existence of witches and wizards, by that I mean, I do not think people spiritually fly out at night, and change into birds, or dogs to harm others, some ask me, “Are you a Christian or a Muslim? Do you believe in God? Which church do you attend? While in Ghana, someone asked, Are you not an African? How one replies to these questions determines if the interrogator will continue the conversation or sign off.
African children and youths are socialized to believe that some people have magical and supernatural powers and could use such powers to harm them or their estates. People are brought up not to question or interrogate these ideas and notions, but to preserve the tradition. The habit of not questioning witchcraft and other religious beliefs forms a part of the social upbringing. This habit shields these superstitions from scrutiny and critical evaluation. It has led to the preservation and handing down of ideas and notions that should have been abandoned or discarded. Unfortunately, these erroneous ideas have been framed as religion or culture; they are deemed sacrosanct and beyond inquiry.
Criticism of these notions is often taken as an offense, a violation of the sensibilities of believers. Critics could be accused of racism or islamophobia. And in consequence, they could suffer structural or sometimes physical violence. As a ‘social duty’, these mistaken notions are forced down the throats of infants and youths from one generation to another.
For instance, in my country, people are brought up to believe that those who live in the villages and rural communities could use their supposed occult or supernatural powers to cause accidents, infertility, death, and other misfortune to relatives who live in cities and some overseas. People who entertain these beliefs and notions are not illiterates, uneducated people, but in many cases well-educated people, doctoral degree holders, and sometimes professors in universities.
Often many of the persons so accused have not physically been to cities; they have not traveled beyond their communities or countries. While doing my fieldwork in Ghana, I met a woman whose daughter, living in the US, accused. In another case, a woman was accused of being responsible for the death of another woman who died as a result of an electrocution in Accra, the capital of Ghana. In the course of my conversation with the accused, she asked me, how could I have gone to Accra to kill this woman, when I did not know the road to Accra?
Another woman accused of killing the daughter asked me, “How could I have killed my daughter now she is an adult and could take care of me? Look I did not do so when she was a baby, was vulnerable when I breastfed and took care of her”. Unfortunately, these thoughtful expressions make no sense to witchcraft accusers and witch hunters.
Others try to shut down critical voices. They accuse one of disrespecting their beliefs. In some cases, their line of defense and justification is often this: “Look, we are Africans”. They make it seem as if to be an African means to be hard-wired to blind faith, magical, occultic, and superstitious thinking and belief. Sometimes, they would say: “not everything is scientifically or logically explainable”. Or they would westernize science and locate their beliefs outside the cannons of Western science. They go to any length to persuade or to find some justification for their outlandish beliefs and claims.
It is pertinent to note that these irrational beliefs do not end as abstracts or at theoretical levels. They have real consequences, especially for the suspected, and the accused. These counterintuitive notions inform actions, mob actions of revenge, attack, violence, and cold-blooded murder of supposed witches or occult harmers. Accusers and suspecters of witchcraft directly confront alleged witches. In cases where they cannot directly attack or tackle supposed witches or occultists, they incite violence and jungle justice against the accused.
In addition, people strongly believe that some sacrifice of human body parts could yield money, success in elections, business, and wealth. Thus some people who want to become rich, and successful consult some religious and occult experts. These ritual experts ask them to go and get some body parts for sacrifice. From time to time people, both children, youths, and adults, are caught with human body parts.
In mainstream and social media, there are often reports of mutilated bodies of those killed by ritualists. There are reports of some police arrests of suspected ritualists but after that, nothing is heard about these reported cases until another incident occurs. In August, someone posted on X formerly known as Twitter, the case of a 16-year-old boy. He abducted, strangled, and mutilated a 4-year-old boy for ritual purposes. There have been cases of ritual killings linked to youths who are involved in internet scams, politicians seeking reelections, and miners and fishermen killing people with albinism in Tanzania and other parts of southern Africa.
In response to this situation, two programs, advocacy for alleged witches and promotion of critical thinking have been launched. In the short term, we advocate against witch persecution, and rescue, rehabilitate, defend, and empower victims. We help victims and their families to respond and neutralize allegations and imputation of occult harm. We support victims and help them report cases to the police, have legal representation in court, get medical care and temporary shelter, or support their education and training. This year we have intervened in over 30 cases of accusations in Nigeria.
In the long term, we work and campaign to foster critical thinking in all areas of human endeavor. At the primary school level, critical thinking is framed as a form of questionstorm. Students are encouraged to question ideas and experiences in all areas of human endeavor. At the moment we are developing critical thinking learning materials that encourage children to question and challenge whatever they are taught or told. We organize workshops for teachers and students, and lobby state education boards to introduce the teaching of critical thinking in schools.
So far, the first edition of the primaries 1 to 3 texts and other learning aid materials have been produced. These materials address critical thinking needs of elementary schoolers. Other critical thinking resources like charts have been developed. The program has a website where these materials are displayed. The site is still a work in progress. The texts and charts have been used to organize workshops for pupils and teachers in selected schools.
You may like
-
Fear Of Witchcraft And Politics In Zambia
-
Questionstorm As A Method Of Teaching
-
Reforming Higher Education In Africa
-
Talking Drums: How Unchained Melodies And Art Will Benefit Africa
-
Mental Health, Accusations Of Witchcraft And Demonic Possession In Nigeria
-
Stand Up For Teachers Of Critical Thinking In Schools
By Leo Igwe
The Advocacy for Alleged Witches (AfAW) is concerned over the reported arrest of two men accused of being ‘witchdoctors’ in Zambia. The arrest underscores the potency of witchcraft fears and the connection between occult anxieties and the country’s politics. These individuals were accused of trying to bewitch the Zambian president, Hakainde Hichilema. The police claimed that they had charms. They planned to use the charms to harm the president. The report says the two persons have been charged under Zambia’s Witchcraft Act. The Act criminalizes “possession of charms”, “professing knowledge of witchcraft”, and “cruelty to wild animals”. The police found the two with assorted charms, including a live chameleon.
This development is utterly embarrassing and shows that the Zambian government is slowly losing its focus and bearing.The country has many socio-economic challenges. Suspicion of bewitchment or possession of charms should be the least of its worries at this time. There should be no place for witchcraft and possession of charms in modern politics because there is no evidence for these beliefs and practices. Zambian authorities should not weaponize the Witchcraft Act or use it to justify this incident. Zambian law does not recognize witchcraft. Zambia’s Witchcraft Act criminalizes naming or imputing witchcraft. It prohibits accusing or threatening to accuse any person of being a witch or a wizard. In this case, it is the police who are breaking the law.
Otherwise, how did they know the two individuals were ‘witchdoctors’? Did these persons identify as witch doctors? If not, the police are liable because they named and imputed witchcraft and have to prove that these individuals have witch-doctoring powers. The police claimed to have charged these individuals for possessing “assorted charms”, including a chameleon. Really?
The police in Zambia have questions to answer: What are charms? How did they know that what was in their possession were charms, not pets? Is a chameleon a form of charm? What makes possession of a chameleon possession of a charm? When and how does a chameleon become a charm? The police need to answer these questions and more before one takes them seriously.
Again, did the individuals describe what was in possession as ‘charms’? If they did, does confessing or designating something as a charm make it a charm? And if they did not, the police are liable because they need to prove how those possessions translated into charms.
In addition, the police claimed that the duo wanted to bewitch the president. What does that mean? How did they know? Are the police not contravening a provision under the Witchcraft Act by professing knowledge of witchcraft? Can one harm another person using a chameleon? They claimed that the two persons wanted to use the charms in their possession, including the chameleon to harm the president. How did they know that? What is the evidence for that?
The Advocacy for Alleged Witches calls for an end to this state-sponsored witch hunt. There is no evidence of harm through witchcraft or charms. The Zambian government should desist from witchcraft- related infractions and violations including arbitrary arrest, and detention of innocent citizens. These allegations are baseless and absurd. The arrest was politically motivated. This development demonstrates that Zambian authorities are out of sync with their duty and obligation to uphold the rule of law and protect accused persons.
Zambian authorities need to act in compliance with the 2021 UN resolution, which urged states to take measures to combat abuses linked to witchcraft beliefs and ritual attacks. End witchcraft allegations in Zambia. End witch hunts in Africa now!
Dr Igwe directs the Advocacy for Alleged Witches.
By Tony Afejuku
The other burning issue, apart from Farotimi and Babalola’s, which I wish to take a look at – and which I am taking a look at now – relates to what is happening in our capital territory. What is this burning issue – which our human rightists and civil society organisations and personages are surprisingly and un-satisfactorily not inclined to focus attention on and examine as they should? I may be wrong, but it surely seems to me that this issue, this burning issue, which is of more importance than Farotimi and Babalola’s – which has been given undue adulation – is deliberately being neglected and depreciated by proclaimers and heroes and heroines of human rights, justice, equity and equality of rights in your country my country our country. Why, why, why and why, why, why? Anyone who has any iota of patriotic sensibility, feeling and judgment well watered and buttressed by a very great influence upon his or her critical judgment will keep on asking the question I am asking.
Mr. Nyesom Wike, as almost everybody who can read and write a little knows, is the current minister of your, my and our Federal Capital Territory. His post or office is akin to that of a governor of a state. As the immediate past governor of Rivers State who was drafted, after his two terms there expired, to continue in the FCT as its new minister-governor or governor-minister under the auspices of a party he is not a true member of, Mr. Wike cannot but be seen as a lucky man. He is in every possible and impossible way. Minister-Governor Wike is a lucky man and a very fortunate one indeed. No former governor of Rivers State (or of any Nigerian state), as far as I know, has achieved what the famed political rouser of rabbles has achieved in one short gubernatorial life-time, and at a relatively young and fertile age. His dual achievement with and in two different political parties at this delicate point of Nigerian politics indicates to our politicians and us all that there is always time for a reminder that there are ready-made high rewards for arch-angels of betrayals. And Mr. Wike may go down in Rivers and Nigerian history as both an arch-angel and an emperor of betrayal of us all if we attempt to indicate what I have defined here as his dual achievement.
We can roughly divide, briefly, Wike’s political development into two periods. During the first, excluding his lower political positions before he became the governor of Rivers State, he quickly adapted his style to that of an emperor who became a rabble-rouser of rabble-rousers whose gubernatorial efficiency moved from stiffness to stiffness. He did not at any time feel that he needed suppleness to govern Rivers State. “Let the heavens fall if they must fall!” We are not there yet in this attempted analysis of the stiff-hearted and stiff-minded one. True? But he is already demonstrating this characteristic in Abuja. False? Judge and give the answer yourself.
Even after he left Rivers State a short while ago as governor, he is still trying to control happenings there to the political discomfiture of his hand-picked successor, his erstwhile “boy” and “son” – with whom he has fallen out. As the minister-governor or governor-minister of the FCT, Wike is occupied with the other taste of the emperor-juggernaut formulator – doing the work of two key political masters in one room and desk of political jugglery. Since his appearance in the FCT, minister-governor or governor-minister Wike has allegedly attempted to recover or transform for Abuja what is not traditionally or socially Abuja’s, for example, the city’s social idiom and landscape and terrain as well as its environs. In doing this he sometimes over-steps his bounds and mark of human/inhuman decency/indecency and psychological understanding of human nature, if you follow well what I am saying; he has so far become at best not really better than a typical pedestrian Nigerian lawyer and officer of political power: in his explorations so far in the Federal Capital Territory we have come to the realization, as T. S. Eliot would say, that “it is so often true that only by going too far can we find out how far we can go.” But one has to be a very negatively obstinate and self-serving emperor and a thorough-bred arch-angel of betrayal of the people and masses to justify such perilous and perfidious expeditions and adventures.
Last week, I saw on Arise Television “The Morning Show” Chief Rita Lori-Ogbebor, the dutiful widow of the late Nigerian supreme patriot and soldier, Colonel Ogbebor (of Benin stock) battling, so to say, to wrest the legacy of her late husband from the tight grip of the adventurous FCT minister-governor who has registered his name and signature in the hearts and consciousness of the people as the depriver of their possessions. The three anchors of “The Morning Show” were in their respective ways splendid in their structures of remarks and questions to Chief (Mrs.) Rita Lori-Ogbebor whom I have had occasions in times past to call patriotically Rita A-K 47 on account of her natural right to fire her beautiful tongue at any person, usually an enemy, of just actions. When she made the case she made to protect the estate of Paulosa Nigeria Limited, her late husband’s aforesaid legacy in the FCT, she was in her natural territory, habitat and element where even at age eighty-four, she never ever loses her stability – although she unusually restrained herself in the Arise Television appearance. Dr. Reuben Abati, Rufai Oseni, and Ayo Mairo-Ese clearly explored seriously but delightfully the mind of the mother-hen of Warri – my other coinage and appellation I gave her in my poetry. Her “The Morning Show” appearance enabled me to see the poignant cry de profundis of the FCT inhabitants whose property and residences in different guises have been demolished. She did not say anything that was out of joint. She spoke and came out as a mother, protector and symbol of the people who have suffered – and are suffering – from the state of affliction and anguish Wike’s demolitions have placed – and are placing – the people.
Ojy Okpe in her delicious and delectable “What is Trending” slot on the same show, showed without exaggeration but with further elaboration what people in and outside Abuja/FCT think of the mighty Wike’s demolitions, a burning issue that the Senate has asked “Let Heaven Fall” minister-governor Wike to halt as the committee the Senate set up on the issue starts its work. Of course, we cannot but assume that Chief Rita Lori-Ogbebor, Mrs. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan as well as Mrs. Ireti Kingigbe, the senator representing the FCT in the Senate and other patriotic senators diligently did what they did on the floor of the Senate when the burning issue was tabled for debate with the gracious understanding and authorization of the Senate President.
I need to state further that the “The Morning Show” anchors did well and extremely so by giving the minister-governor the opportunity to air his anti-Paulosa story. His senior special assistant on public communication and social media, Mr. Olalere Olayinka, stood in for him. After he gave the reasons for the clamp-down, his responses to the questions the anchors put to him followed the usual pattern of denials by artificial men in power – denials that they always use to intimidate and betray the people. In fact, Mr. Olayinka’s ploy to ride easily over our dear Rufai Oseni, a wholesome representative of the deprived, that the chap (or is it guy?) and his boss always employ their colloquial speeches and remarks to dishonor, failed. Yes, the ploy failed woefully. In stanza after stanza of the exchanges between Mr. Olayinka and the Arise anchors, he deteriorated – and his deterioration was hall-marked when he unwittingly revealed that the Paulosa land had been acquired by his minister-governor’s close cohort, an act that was nothing short of gross abuse of power and authority.
Because the Senate is already using its authority, power and privilege to resolve the burning issue, hopefully, in a way that the late Colonel Ogbebor’s legacy and family will not be subjected to any kind of degradation, I will utter no more words for now. I trust, however, that the liberties the Senate is taking – or has taken – are for the sake of order to favour the down-trodden.
As for the minister-governor, the PDP emperor at large, here is an immortal quote from Marcus Aurelius, the magnificent and authentic Roman Emperor and philosopher (A.D. 121-180): “If it is not right, do not do it; if it is not true, do not say it.” You lose nothing by giving us a slice of your humanity by your right acts and correct words. Everything changes and passes. Be humane as a human being.
Afejuku can be reached via 08055213059.
By Leo Igwe
Recently, I facilitated a critical thinking workshop at the Bay Wreath Schools in Lagos. The theme was critical thinking and teacher development. As the theme stated, the workshop was on teaching, about teaching, and for teachers. It highlighted the pedagogical value of critical and reflective inquiry. The workshop exposed teachers to critical mental habits and skills. It emphasized how critical thinking would enhance expertise in the learning and delivery of subjects in classrooms.
I used the opportunity to discuss questionstorm as a method of teaching and learning. Questionstorm is a way that I operationalized critical thinking for primary and elementary schools. Questionstorm is the ability to interrogate all objects and materials. It is a habit of questioning ideas and experiences in all areas of human endeavor. Simply put, questionstorm is a question-driven inquiry. Children are naturally curious. They thirst for knowledge and understanding. Unfortunately, the school system kills children’s curiosity and dampens their interrogative appetite. The school system places much emphasis on rote learning and memorization. It makes the generation of answers not questions or problems the test of knowledge, and the determinant of intelligence. Teaching is largely a drudgery, a monotonous exercise, and a process of depositing knowledge on passive recipients, the students. Teaching entails dumping information on learners whose duty is to cram and reproduce during tests or examinations.
This teaching praxis has been criticized and blamed for the poor performance of students post-school (college and university) and their inability to think independently, creatively, and innovatively. Other teaching methods have tried to address these gaps and limitations. There have been suggestions to make teaching and instruction more active, and more student/learner/child-centered. One such method is the Montessori method. The Montessori method discourages grades and tests as ways of measuring achievement or determining intelligence and excellence. It emphasizes hands-on learning and the development of real-world skills. While the Montessori method stresses the practical approach to learning it says very little about the authoritarian teacher-to-student approach that is the mainstay of teaching and learning in classrooms. Teaching follows a pattern that leaves students and learners in the margins and unable to question and contribute to the learning process. Teachers present what is to be learned such as a text, and then generate questions that students respond or address to demonstrate knowledge of what has been taught. The student’s or learner’s main job is to answer questions, to look for or find answers or solutions. The teacher’s work is to get students to look for, and provide answers, and reproduce what they have been taught or told. But students are answer-depots. Students are not memory banks or reserves. They are active minds and thinking agents.
With questionstorm as a teaching method, the mode of instruction would change. Teaching becomes a cooperative endeavor that actively involves teachers and students. What is taught in the classroom is a collaborative note, not the teacher’s note, not a handout to students. Teachers present or generate texts or objects for learning, in response to intense questioning of the object or material by students, teachers provide information as required for that subject, topic, level, and time frame. No two instances of teaching – of the same topic or subject- are or should be the same because the input of students and teachers is not predetermined.
This is because of an overlooked principle in teaching and learning, that I call the “uncertainty principle”.
The uncertainty principle underlies questionstorm because knowledge is not fixed. Learning is a fluid process. All that is to be learned is uncertain, it is unknown and never determined. No teacher can say beforehand what is to be taught or learned because no one knows exactly the questions and answers or replies that would arise when a topic is presented or taught in a particular class. A topic or learning material elicits unique responses and exchanges that both teachers and students cannot exactly know or predict a priori, before the fact.
Teaching is a shared task and responsibility. Class notes are fluid materials. They are not texts cast on educational stones and delivered by teachers to students to copy, cut, and paste as is often the case. Class notes are not written or produced by teachers for students but by teachers with students. Teachers’ notes are incomplete and insufficient. They account only for a part, not a whole of the learning process and material. Students’ input completes and complements the teaching material and learning process. Thus every class note is unique because it is a product of a specific collaborative endeavor, a product of particular teaching and learning agents and circumstances that cannot be repeated or replicated.
Thus, as a teaching method, questionstorm is set to facilitate teacher development and improve the quality of instruction in schools. Questionstorm will help realize a paradigm shift in education and learning. I hope educators, teachers, and school managers will embrace this method of teaching and learning.
Dr Igwe directs the Critical Thinking Social Empowerment Foundation.
Inline image
NEW TIMES CULTURE
Fear Of Witchcraft And Politics In Zambia
Black Saturday As 10 Confirmed Dead, Others Injured In Abuja Church Stampede
Tinubu Congratulates Civil Service Commission Chair Olaopa As He Turns 65
Top Stories
-
Latest News5 days ago
BREAKING: Govt Renames University Of Abuja
-
Opinion2 days ago
Burning Issues: (FCT Minister And Paulosa) (2)
-
Latest News3 hours ago
Black Saturday As 10 Confirmed Dead, Others Injured In Abuja Church Stampede
-
Metro2 days ago
AfAW Decries Court Acquittal Of Suspected Murderer Of Alleged Witch In Enugu
-
Latest News4 days ago
Why We Set Up Kojola Dry Port – Abiodun