Connect with us

Opinion

Woro Si Woro!

Published

on

Dele Jegede In Conversation With Prince Yemisi Shyllon
Prof. Toyin Falola

By Toyin Falola

It was a little wandering at Offa on December 8, 2023, while exchanging good banters that an old acquaintance of mine told me of his multiple troubles, so many that I said you could not be at Offa and not suffer, if only for its poetic rhyme. “Your case,” I said, “is what we call woro-si-woro. When you wake up each morning thinking about where to get the money to buy food and petrol, your son says the N1,000 loaf of bread is not enough to fill his stomach. Woro si woro! At work, your wife called you to say the landlord asked you to vacate your apartment as you owe four months of unpaid rent. Woro si woro. As if you are the only one in the world that has problems, your son was sent away from school as you cannot pay the fees. Woro si woro

Thinking I would be of some assistance with a cash gift, I told him a real story, what we call the “original” woro si woro, a mountain of troubles. After reading this, share your woro si woro with me, and we can judge who is carrying the heavier burden. Over 130 million Nigerians now tell daily stories of woro si woro. Don’t cry with the real story that I want to share with you.

When trouble comes, it sends no signal. Woro si woro. This was the case of OJ, a thirty-four-year-old man who returned to his motherland after hustling overseas. His arrival at the airport brought nostalgic feelings, as he had left the country about five years ago, having expended his entire savings as a community clerk in the local council to seek a better life. 

His journey back home was for three reasons. One was to attend the ceremony of the chieftaincy title bestowed upon his paternal uncle, who had been the principal in his hometown for three decades. Second, he had plans to get the paperwork for the house he was building, sending money home from time to time. Third, and his main project, he was home to complete the marriage rites to his betrothed, whom he had dutifully catered to during his absence. He smiled as he recalled the news some weeks after his departure. He received a call that Kike, his girlfriend of two years, was pregnant, and he had no reason to doubt the news, as he remembered vividly the escapades they indulged in before his departure.  As he descended the staircases leading to the exterior parts of the airport, he heaved a sigh of relief. It felt good to be home. He will see Kike, his wife-to-be, and his child, see the status of his first house, and attend a great party to honour his uncle.

OJ probably forgot that Nigeria is a land of surprises, and one must have an inbuilt “shock absorber” to cushion the effect of deadly shocks and surprises. The first surprise came when he could not find a house on the land that his property was supposed to be built on. He was welcomed by overgrown bushes, aspiring to become a forest, while his blood brother quavered, unable to explain how the white mansion he was assisting him to build disappeared overnight. Woro si Woro Number 1.

He had not recovered from that when he decided to pay Miss Kike a surprise visit. He had not told her he was coming, but he needed to see her and his daughter, especially to let off some steam and help him think. After futile efforts by his cousin to dissuade him from going, the second surprise that culminated into a shock came when he found out that the child was not his, and Kike was secretly cohabiting and perceived to be engaged to her boyfriend. The man in question was his best friend. He realised he was the “sidekick” fronting the bills of his fraudulent girlfriend and her true partner, his best friend. He had sent thousands of naira as upkeep without fail; the pregnancy for which he dutifully catered was not his in the first place. He realised he had been duped twice. From frying pan to fire. O di woro si woro. Can anything worse happen to a man than this?

Just like OJ and many before and after him, the issues of paternity fraud have dealt men severe blows that may take years to heal, while some may never recover from it. Woro si woro! The sorrow that succeeds the realization of this heart-wrenching fraud is so dire that the victims often lose faith in mutual attachments to the opposite gender. The labour of many years just went down the drain. Just like that! Issues of infidelity in recent times are on the rise, and both genders are guilty of it. They have become integral parts of the community amebo in social gatherings. The walls of the internet have long overruled the hushed tones that discuss these matters with no remorse. It will not be surprising to find it happen to your next-door neighbour, someone from your religious circle or a boss at work. It is a menace that the majority is not safe from now. Just this week, there was a post online jokingly warning men to stay away from the women in a particular state in Southwest Nigeria. The post further continued that “one who wishes for a partner from that part should first listen to a popular radio program in that state.” In as much as it is wrong to subscribe to that line of thought, dragging the credibility of the good women of that state through mud, one can infer from the post that the subject matter is truly a social problem.

Infidelity and paternity fraud are universal social problems in today’s world. Although there are variations in the intricacies surrounding this matter and how they are viewed, African societies are no exception, though the emphasis on family integrity is more in these regions than in other parts of the world. In Africa, family names and genealogy are held in high esteem, with the common tradition of eulogising individuals from the present moment till it connects with their ancestral heritage. Thus, the practice of infidelity and paternity fraud are viewed as deliberate attacks on the fabrics of family, social order and harmony. It is viewed as a communal betrayal, as the society embraces communal existence deeply rooted in loyalty and fidelity. In a traditional African family setting, spousal infidelity and paternity fraud, where the father of a child is misrepresented, poses a threat to the continuity of the family’s lineage and the community. It could lead to aggravated disputes over family land rights, chieftaincy titles, heirlooms and inheritance, causing extended conflicts in the community at large. Ironically, in Africa, Jamaica has the highest rate of paternity fraud cases, followed by Nigeria. Naija no dey carry last, especially in wrong things!

Woro si woro! High paternity dispute is more prevalent in Africa, as the society emphasizes childbirth in marriages. A marriage without offspring is deemed unsuccessful. Apart from this, the issue of paternity fraud and infidelity can cause serious harm to the victim when it is discovered. In most cases, fatherhood is judged through marriage to the woman who becomes pregnant, as it is assumed that the man is the sole sexual partner. Other means are through acknowledgement, where the man affirms that he is responsible for the pregnancy. A man is naturally responsible for his family, so the weight of this deceit is felt more by him. During an interview with Premium Times, Mr. Abiodun Salami, a senior geneticist with DNA Centre for Paternity, Lagos, confirmed that the supposed men did not father six out of ten children brought for the test. He also stated that couples come for paternity tests nowadays at an alarming rate, compared to before, as about 400 paternity tests are being done in the centre monthly. As with health cases in Nigeria, this may pass as minimal statistics, as most cases are usually unreported to avoid stigma.

The reasons for these are not far-fetched. In most cases, it is precipitated by economic dependence on one’s partner and African relationships are masked with the man providing for the needs of his partner and, by extension, her immediate family. As such, issues of survival come into play as the lady who already has numerous partners may be at a loss deciding on who to go for. Usually, such a person would later settle for the one with the highest economic benefits and may have to push another’s pregnancy on him. Apart from this, another “motivation” that is closely related to the above is social status. People venture into different matters due to the benefits it accrues to them. Here, social status is the main motivator. The affiliation to a family of high standing may depose one to commit the fraud. The Nigerian movie industry is filled with stories of this nature where women commit paternity fraud just to be in relations with the elites in the society. While these movies may not be taken as evidence, the lines of thought they portray show similar happenings in our society.

Also, the social expectations for family structure and gender roles have played major roles in these acts. A marriage is expected to be fruitful by the number of children therein. In order to meet up with these norms, many women have been forced to seek extra hands outside marriage to get pregnant. This occurs in cases where she suspects the husband of infertility but is unable to communicate with him due to cultural stigma that finds these matters offensive for discussion. As it is in many African societies, every sign of infertility is usually stamped upon the woman. As a result, she is forced to get another means to an end to keep her space. There are also cases where a man is gay but marries a woman to keep up his appearance. Body no be firewood, she most definitely would find a man who would cater to her needs and give her the children she wants. Here, the woman becomes a victim of circumstance.  Another reason is the cultural backlash on abortion. Our society frowns on these acts and considers those who engage in them  irresponsible. As such, many young women who engage in premarital sexual acts have been forced to move into marriage to avoid stigmatization. In view of this, it is either she ends up with the birth father, or she moves in with another unsuspecting suitor who has been on her matter for a long time to save face. This is usually possible, as most relationships are watered by the sexual acts involved. 

It would be unfair to slam women as the blameworthy ones here, although they are to be held responsible, as the case may be. Men also have a role to play in these matters. Men also cheat. The internet is flooded with tales of married men sliding mischievously into the DMs of women seeking sexual gratifications. As nature has it, these men can go for long without getting caught, as they do not get pregnant or bear children that would make people suspect them of extramarital affairs. The onus falls more on women who naturally are bound to be pregnant from sexual acts. A mischievous, sexually energized man who always finds his way is only destroying the home of another. Many men have children, even a second family that their “main family” know nothing about, but all hell is let loose when a woman gives Taye’s child to Tamedo. Also, the patriarchal African-dominated society deems it taboo to discuss men falling short of being able to procreate despite the advancement in medical sciences. This often makes women go outside their marriages to get pregnant to keep and maintain their husband’s pride and social status. It would be unthinkable to hear that a man shoots blanks. Most times, this extra effort is done outside the personal interests of the man. In rare cases, human errors during childbirth may be responsible for wrongful claims of fraud. Babies may be wrongfully identified with tags at birth. In such cases, no test can ascertain fatherhood.

The trouble lies in the imminent discovery. What happens when the ugly truth comes out?  The implications of paternity fraud are multifaceted, and it affects every party involved. Marital sanctity is a major backbone of our societies; it should be revered and held in very high esteem, and the thriving issues of sexualities that lure people to sexual acts should be shunned. Contemporary African societies should seek an equilibrium between the values we hold in esteem and modern trends to avoid mistakes.

Lastly, legal reforms should be made to address issues of paternity fraud. Rather than committing violent crimes or suicide out of rage, it is advisable to seek redress in court while shielding and supporting children involved in such cases, as they are not to be blamed for what transpired. In all, use twenty out of twenty-four hours to fear women. Fear men, too. In fact, fear every human being but fear who does not fear both men and women and those in between. 

OJ could not attend the chieftaincy title. He decided to return to Ame. On reaching the airport, he could not find his passport and his wallet. On a Thursday, I saw a man in rags in front of me. He looked at me and shouted my name TF. “I don’t know you,” I said. “You know me, the junior brother of your friend, Buoda Bayo, aburo Mama Yemi.” He is right. The story took him too long to tell. Woro si woro are stories of shame, humiliation and stress that lead a decent adult to beg for food. I took him to my house, not knowing that he would transfer his woro si woro to me. I am yet to recover.

Today, many Nigerians have too many stories of Woro si woro! What woro si woro is yours?

  

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Opinion

Fear Of Witchcraft And Politics In Zambia

Published

on

Witch Burning, Impunity And Abuses Linked to Witchcraft Beliefs In Benue State
Dr Leo Igwe

By Leo Igwe

The Advocacy for Alleged Witches (AfAW) is concerned over the reported arrest of two men accused of being ‘witchdoctors’ in Zambia. The arrest underscores the potency of witchcraft fears and the connection between occult anxieties and the country’s politics. These individuals were accused of trying to bewitch the Zambian president, Hakainde Hichilema. The police claimed that they had charms. They planned to use the charms to harm the president. The report says the two persons have been charged under Zambia’s Witchcraft Act. The Act criminalizes “possession of charms”, “professing knowledge of witchcraft”, and “cruelty to wild animals”. The police found the two with assorted charms, including a live chameleon.

This development is utterly embarrassing and shows that the Zambian government is slowly losing its focus and bearing.The country has many socio-economic challenges. Suspicion of bewitchment or possession of charms should be the least of its worries at this time. There should be no place for witchcraft and possession of charms in modern politics because there is no evidence for these beliefs and practices. Zambian authorities should not weaponize the Witchcraft Act or use it to justify this incident. Zambian law does not recognize witchcraft. Zambia’s Witchcraft Act criminalizes naming or imputing witchcraft. It prohibits accusing or threatening to accuse any person of being a witch or a wizard. In this case, it is the police who are breaking the law.

Otherwise, how did they know the two individuals were ‘witchdoctors’? Did these persons identify as witch doctors? If not, the police are liable because they named and imputed witchcraft and have to prove that these individuals have witch-doctoring powers. The police claimed to have charged these individuals for possessing “assorted charms”, including a chameleon. Really?

The police in Zambia have questions to answer: What are charms? How did they know that what was in their possession were charms, not pets? Is a chameleon a form of charm? What makes possession of a chameleon possession of a charm? When and how does a chameleon become a charm? The police need to answer these questions and more before one takes them seriously.

Again, did the individuals describe what was in possession as ‘charms’? If they did, does confessing or designating something as a charm make it a charm? And if they did not, the police are liable because they need to prove how those possessions translated into charms.

In addition, the police claimed that the duo wanted to bewitch the president. What does that mean? How did they know? Are the police not contravening a provision under the Witchcraft Act by professing knowledge of witchcraft? Can one harm another person using a chameleon? They claimed that the two persons wanted to use the charms in their possession, including the chameleon to harm the president. How did they know that? What is the evidence for that?

The Advocacy for Alleged Witches calls for an end to this state-sponsored witch hunt. There is no evidence of harm through witchcraft or charms. The Zambian government should desist from witchcraft- related infractions and violations including arbitrary arrest, and detention of innocent citizens. These allegations are baseless and absurd. The arrest was politically motivated. This development demonstrates that Zambian authorities are out of sync with their duty and obligation to uphold the rule of law and protect accused persons.

Zambian authorities need to act in compliance with the 2021 UN resolution, which urged states to take measures to combat abuses linked to witchcraft beliefs and ritual attacks. End witchcraft allegations in Zambia. End witch hunts in Africa now!

Dr Igwe directs the Advocacy for Alleged Witches.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Burning Issues: (FCT Minister And Paulosa) (2)

Published

on

Readers’ Showers Of Encouragement
Prof. Tony Afejuku

By Tony Afejuku

The other burning issue, apart from Farotimi and Babalola’s, which I wish to take a look at – and which I am taking a look at now – relates to what is happening in our capital territory. What is this burning issue – which our human rightists and civil society organisations and personages are surprisingly and un-satisfactorily not inclined to focus attention on and examine as they should? I may be wrong, but it surely seems to me that this issue, this burning issue, which is of more importance than Farotimi and Babalola’s – which has been given undue adulation – is deliberately being neglected and depreciated by proclaimers and heroes and heroines of human rights, justice, equity and equality of rights in your country my country our country. Why, why, why and why, why, why? Anyone who has any iota of patriotic sensibility, feeling and judgment well watered and buttressed by a very great influence upon his or her critical judgment will keep on asking the question I am asking.

Mr. Nyesom Wike, as almost everybody who can read and write a little knows, is the current minister of your, my and our Federal Capital Territory. His post or office is akin to that of a governor of a state. As the immediate past governor of Rivers State who was drafted, after his two terms there expired, to continue in the FCT as its new minister-governor or governor-minister under the auspices of a party he is not a true member of, Mr. Wike cannot but be seen as a lucky man. He is in every possible and impossible way. Minister-Governor Wike is a lucky man and a very fortunate one indeed. No former governor of Rivers State (or of any Nigerian state), as far as I know, has achieved what the famed political rouser of rabbles has achieved in one short gubernatorial life-time, and at a relatively young and fertile age. His dual achievement with and in two different political parties at this delicate point of Nigerian politics indicates to our politicians and us all that there is always time for a reminder that there are ready-made high rewards for arch-angels of betrayals. And Mr. Wike may go down in Rivers and Nigerian history as both an arch-angel and an emperor of betrayal of us all if we attempt to indicate what I have defined here as his dual achievement.

We can roughly divide, briefly, Wike’s political development into two periods. During the first, excluding his lower political positions before he became the governor of Rivers State, he quickly adapted his style to that of an emperor who became a rabble-rouser of rabble-rousers whose gubernatorial efficiency moved from stiffness to stiffness. He did not at any time feel that he needed suppleness to govern Rivers State. “Let the heavens fall if they must fall!” We are not there yet in this attempted analysis of the stiff-hearted and stiff-minded one. True? But he is already demonstrating this characteristic in Abuja. False? Judge and give the answer yourself.

Even after he left Rivers State a short while ago as governor, he is still trying to control happenings there to the political discomfiture of his hand-picked successor, his erstwhile “boy” and “son” – with whom he has fallen out. As the minister-governor or governor-minister of the FCT, Wike is occupied with the other taste of the emperor-juggernaut formulator – doing the work of two key political masters in one room and desk of political jugglery. Since his appearance in the FCT, minister-governor or governor-minister Wike has allegedly attempted to recover or transform for Abuja what is not traditionally or socially Abuja’s, for example, the city’s social idiom and landscape and terrain as well as its environs. In doing this he sometimes over-steps his bounds and mark of human/inhuman decency/indecency and psychological understanding of human nature, if you follow well what I am saying; he has so far become at best not really better than a typical pedestrian Nigerian lawyer and officer of political power: in his explorations so far in the Federal Capital Territory we have come to the realization, as T. S. Eliot would say, that “it is so often true that only by going too far can we find out how far we can go.” But one has to be a very negatively obstinate and self-serving emperor and a thorough-bred arch-angel of betrayal of the people and masses to justify such perilous and perfidious expeditions and adventures.

Last week, I saw on Arise Television “The Morning Show” Chief Rita Lori-Ogbebor, the dutiful widow of the late Nigerian supreme patriot and soldier, Colonel Ogbebor (of Benin stock) battling, so to say, to wrest the legacy of her late husband from the tight grip of the adventurous FCT minister-governor who has registered his name and signature in the hearts and consciousness of the people as the depriver of their possessions. The three anchors of “The Morning Show” were in their respective ways splendid in their structures of remarks and questions to Chief (Mrs.) Rita Lori-Ogbebor whom I have had occasions in times past to call patriotically Rita A-K 47 on account of her natural right to fire her beautiful tongue at any person, usually an enemy, of just actions. When she made the case she made to protect the estate of Paulosa Nigeria Limited, her late husband’s aforesaid legacy in the FCT, she was in her natural territory, habitat and element where even at age eighty-four, she never ever loses her stability – although she unusually restrained herself in the Arise Television appearance. Dr. Reuben Abati, Rufai Oseni, and Ayo Mairo-Ese clearly explored seriously but delightfully the mind of the mother-hen of Warri – my other coinage and appellation I gave her in my poetry. Her “The Morning Show” appearance enabled me to see the poignant cry de profundis of the FCT inhabitants whose property and residences in different guises have been demolished. She did not say anything that was out of joint. She spoke and came out as a mother, protector and symbol of the people who have suffered – and are suffering – from the state of affliction and anguish Wike’s demolitions have placed – and are placing – the people.

Ojy Okpe in her delicious and delectable “What is Trending” slot on the same show, showed without exaggeration but with further elaboration what people in and outside Abuja/FCT think of the mighty Wike’s demolitions, a burning issue that the Senate has asked “Let Heaven Fall” minister-governor Wike to halt as the committee the Senate set up on the issue starts its work. Of course, we cannot but assume that Chief Rita Lori-Ogbebor, Mrs. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan as well as Mrs. Ireti Kingigbe, the senator representing the FCT in the Senate and other patriotic senators diligently did what they did on the floor of the Senate when the burning issue was tabled for debate with the gracious understanding and authorization of the Senate President.

I need to state further that the “The Morning Show” anchors did well and extremely so by giving the minister-governor the opportunity to air his anti-Paulosa story. His senior special assistant on public communication and social media, Mr. Olalere Olayinka, stood in for him. After he gave the reasons for the clamp-down, his responses to the questions the anchors put to him followed the usual pattern of denials by artificial men in power – denials that they always use to intimidate and betray the people. In fact, Mr. Olayinka’s ploy to ride easily over our dear Rufai Oseni, a wholesome representative of the deprived, that the chap (or is it guy?) and his boss always employ their colloquial speeches and remarks to dishonor, failed. Yes, the ploy failed woefully. In stanza after stanza of the exchanges between Mr. Olayinka and the Arise anchors, he deteriorated – and his deterioration was hall-marked when he unwittingly revealed that the Paulosa land had been acquired by his minister-governor’s close cohort, an act that was nothing short of gross abuse of power and authority.

Because the Senate is already using its authority, power and privilege to resolve the burning issue, hopefully, in a way that the late Colonel Ogbebor’s legacy and family will not be subjected to any kind of degradation, I will utter no more words for now. I trust, however, that the liberties the Senate is taking – or has taken – are for the sake of order to favour the down-trodden.

As for the minister-governor, the PDP emperor at large, here is an immortal quote from Marcus Aurelius, the magnificent and authentic Roman Emperor and philosopher (A.D. 121-180): “If it is not right, do not do it; if it is not true, do not say it.” You lose nothing by giving us a slice of your humanity by your right acts and correct words. Everything changes and passes. Be humane as a human being.

Afejuku can be reached via 08055213059.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Questionstorm As A Method Of Teaching

Published

on

Witch Burning, Impunity And Abuses Linked to Witchcraft Beliefs In Benue State

By Leo Igwe

Recently, I facilitated a critical thinking workshop at the Bay Wreath Schools in Lagos. The theme was critical thinking and teacher development. As the theme stated, the workshop was on teaching, about teaching, and for teachers. It highlighted the pedagogical value of critical and reflective inquiry. The workshop exposed teachers to critical mental habits and skills. It emphasized how critical thinking would enhance expertise in the learning and delivery of subjects in classrooms.

I used the opportunity to discuss questionstorm as a method of teaching and learning. Questionstorm is a way that I operationalized critical thinking for primary and elementary schools. Questionstorm is the ability to interrogate all objects and materials. It is a habit of questioning ideas and experiences in all areas of human endeavor. Simply put, questionstorm is a question-driven inquiry. Children are naturally curious. They thirst for knowledge and understanding. Unfortunately, the school system kills children’s curiosity and dampens their interrogative appetite. The school system places much emphasis on rote learning and memorization. It makes the generation of answers not questions or problems the test of knowledge, and the determinant of intelligence. Teaching is largely a drudgery, a monotonous exercise, and a process of depositing knowledge on passive recipients, the students. Teaching entails dumping information on learners whose duty is to cram and reproduce during tests or examinations.

This teaching praxis has been criticized and blamed for the poor performance of students post-school (college and university) and their inability to think independently, creatively, and innovatively. Other teaching methods have tried to address these gaps and limitations. There have been suggestions to make teaching and instruction more active, and more student/learner/child-centered. One such method is the Montessori method. The Montessori method discourages grades and tests as ways of measuring achievement or determining intelligence and excellence. It emphasizes hands-on learning and the development of real-world skills. While the Montessori method stresses the practical approach to learning it says very little about the authoritarian teacher-to-student approach that is the mainstay of teaching and learning in classrooms. Teaching follows a pattern that leaves students and learners in the margins and unable to question and contribute to the learning process. Teachers present what is to be learned such as a text, and then generate questions that students respond or address to demonstrate knowledge of what has been taught. The student’s or learner’s main job is to answer questions, to look for or find answers or solutions. The teacher’s work is to get students to look for, and provide answers, and reproduce what they have been taught or told. But students are answer-depots. Students are not memory banks or reserves. They are active minds and thinking agents.

With questionstorm as a teaching method, the mode of instruction would change. Teaching becomes a cooperative endeavor that actively involves teachers and students. What is taught in the classroom is a collaborative note, not the teacher’s note, not a handout to students. Teachers present or generate texts or objects for learning, in response to intense questioning of the object or material by students, teachers provide information as required for that subject, topic, level, and time frame. No two instances of teaching – of the same topic or subject- are or should be the same because the input of students and teachers is not predetermined.
This is because of an overlooked principle in teaching and learning, that I call the “uncertainty principle”.

The uncertainty principle underlies questionstorm because knowledge is not fixed. Learning is a fluid process. All that is to be learned is uncertain, it is unknown and never determined. No teacher can say beforehand what is to be taught or learned because no one knows exactly the questions and answers or replies that would arise when a topic is presented or taught in a particular class. A topic or learning material elicits unique responses and exchanges that both teachers and students cannot exactly know or predict a priori, before the fact.

Teaching is a shared task and responsibility. Class notes are fluid materials. They are not texts cast on educational stones and delivered by teachers to students to copy, cut, and paste as is often the case. Class notes are not written or produced by teachers for students but by teachers with students. Teachers’ notes are incomplete and insufficient. They account only for a part, not a whole of the learning process and material. Students’ input completes and complements the teaching material and learning process. Thus every class note is unique because it is a product of a specific collaborative endeavor, a product of particular teaching and learning agents and circumstances that cannot be repeated or replicated.

Thus, as a teaching method, questionstorm is set to facilitate teacher development and improve the quality of instruction in schools. Questionstorm will help realize a paradigm shift in education and learning. I hope educators, teachers, and school managers will embrace this method of teaching and learning.

Dr  Igwe directs the Critical Thinking Social Empowerment Foundation.

 

Inline image

Continue Reading

Top Stories